March, 2012:

Peguam dapat akses pada kertas mahkamah Perancis

Saman sivil NGO hak asasi Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) terhadap gergasi pertahanan tentera laut Perancis DCNS kerana didakwa membayar komisen kepada pemimpin di Malaysia mula menunjukkan perkembangan memberangsangkan.

NONEPada Khamis, peguam Suaram di Perancis memberitahu NGO itu, mereka sudah mendapat akses kepada kertas mahkamah berkaitan kes melibatkan pembelian kapal selam Scorpene bernilai RM77.3 bilion.

Pengarah Suaram Cynthia Gabriel berkata, barisan peguam mereka kini boleh mengkaji dokumen dan menasihat tindakan se;anjutnya.

“Kami bagaimanapun tidak dapat mempamerkan dokumen itu. Kami hanya boleh akses, mengkaji dan membuat rujukan terhadapnya, tetapi tidak boleh diumumkan menurut undang-undang Perancis,” katanya kepada Malaysiakini.

“Ini memang cabaran besar kepada tetapi kami berbesar hati kerana kes itu bergerak ke arah yang betul dan memberi momentum,” tambahnya.

altantuya and son 050309Dua kapal selam itu dibeli pada tahun 2002 oleh kerajaan Malaysia ketika Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak bertugas sebagai menteri pertahanan.

Perimekar, syarikat yang dikaitkan dengan Abdul Razak Baginda – orang kepercayaan Najib – dibayar 114 juta euro atau RM570 juta, untuk bertindak sebagai ‘orang tengah’ dalam urus niaga penuh kontroversi itu.

Kerajaan bagaimanapun berkata, pembayaran besar kepada Perimekar untuk perkhidmatan “koordinasi dan sokongan’.

Abdul Razak dan dua pengawal peribadi Najib didakwa membunuh Altantuya Sharibuu pada tahun 2006, tetapi selepas dibicarakan beliau kemudiannya dibebaskan, manakala dua yang lain didapati bersalah dan dihukum mati.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=22900







Posted by
on Mar 31 2012. Filed under berita.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Peguam dapat akses pada kertas mahkamah Perancis

Saman sivil NGO hak asasi Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) terhadap gergasi pertahanan tentera laut Perancis DCNS kerana didakwa membayar komisen kepada pemimpin di Malaysia mula menunjukkan perkembangan memberangsangkan.

NONEPada Khamis, peguam Suaram di Perancis memberitahu NGO itu, mereka sudah mendapat akses kepada kertas mahkamah berkaitan kes melibatkan pembelian kapal selam Scorpene bernilai RM77.3 bilion.

Pengarah Suaram Cynthia Gabriel berkata, barisan peguam mereka kini boleh mengkaji dokumen dan menasihat tindakan se;anjutnya.

“Kami bagaimanapun tidak dapat mempamerkan dokumen itu. Kami hanya boleh akses, mengkaji dan membuat rujukan terhadapnya, tetapi tidak boleh diumumkan menurut undang-undang Perancis,” katanya kepada Malaysiakini.

“Ini memang cabaran besar kepada tetapi kami berbesar hati kerana kes itu bergerak ke arah yang betul dan memberi momentum,” tambahnya.

altantuya and son 050309Dua kapal selam itu dibeli pada tahun 2002 oleh kerajaan Malaysia ketika Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak bertugas sebagai menteri pertahanan.

Perimekar, syarikat yang dikaitkan dengan Abdul Razak Baginda – orang kepercayaan Najib – dibayar 114 juta euro atau RM570 juta, untuk bertindak sebagai ‘orang tengah’ dalam urus niaga penuh kontroversi itu.

Kerajaan bagaimanapun berkata, pembayaran besar kepada Perimekar untuk perkhidmatan “koordinasi dan sokongan’.

Abdul Razak dan dua pengawal peribadi Najib didakwa membunuh Altantuya Sharibuu pada tahun 2006, tetapi selepas dibicarakan beliau kemudiannya dibebaskan, manakala dua yang lain didapati bersalah dan dihukum mati.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=22900







Posted by
on Mar 31 2012. Filed under berita.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Vietnam battles lingering bird flu threat

Vietnam battles lingering bird flu threat

HANOI: Vietnam may have contained the fatal bird flu outbreak that raged in the late 2000s but it is still struggling with new cases of the disease that have puzzled experts in the communist country.

 

Since January, bird flu outbreaks have occurred in 14 provinces. About 65,000 chicken and ducks have died or been culled. Authorities have confirmed four human cases, of which two have been fatal.

 

It’s a long way from the peak in 2003 to 2009 when the virus infected millions of fowl and killed 57 people — making Vietnam the second worst-hit country after Indonesia, according to the World Health Organisation.

 

In 2011, the country reported no new human cases, but the virus was still there, less threatening but not eradicated.

 

“Bird flu has a harmful impact on agriculture, on people’s lives, with the reappearance of new weaker strains,” said Hoang Van Nam, director of the animal health department at the agriculture ministry.

 

Outbreaks happen nationwide, he said, adding this was due to a mix of the family structure of farming, a lack of information and gaps in vaccination and farm control programmes.

 

Concerns about avian influenza have risen in the region with China, Cambodia and Indonesia all reporting deaths from the H5N1 strain of the virus this year.

 

But traders at this city’s Ha Vi market, where between 80 and 100 tonnes of live birds are sold every day, say they are not concerned.

 

“Who said there is a bird flu epidemic here? This doesn’t interest me. They exaggerate these things. I know only that all my chickens are in good health,” market vendor Do Thi Thanh Hoa told AFP.

 

She said neither she nor her colleagues had to provide certificates of origin or vaccination for the birds they sell.

 

“Since the market opened, no one has been infected with H5N1. In this market, even when there is a ban, we still buy chickens and eat meat. Everyone is fine,” said Dao Thi Ngoc, another farmer.

 

“The TV keeps talking about H5N1. Where is it happening?”.

 

State television regularly runs reports on the dangers of transporting poultry that has not been vaccinated, warning of the risks of buying birds smuggled in from China.

 

But in a country where humans and fowl live side by side and where small, family-owned units dominate poultry production, it is almost impossible to monitor every bird slaughtered and sold.

 

“There are too many small farms. You can’t control all the cullings. Sometimes, hygiene standards are neglected, sometimes they’re abandoned,” said Can Xuan Binh, director of animal health services here.

 

As it does every year, the government has been trying to promote better disinfection of contaminated farms, vaccination programmes and mass culls to keep a lid on H5N1 outbreaks.

 

But despite such efforts, officials have struggled to control the transportation and sale of live birds — one of the key drivers of the spread of the disease.

 

And to add to their problems, experts have identified new strains of the virus in certain Vietnamese provinces that are proving resistant to the usual vaccine.

 

“The vaccine is no longer effective. The capacity for protection is henceforth limited,” said Hoang Van Nam, adding up to 100 million doses of a new type of vaccine will soon have to be imported from China.

 

Some experts blame Vietnam’s lingering H5N1 problem on political incoherence which, they say, undermines overall efforts to bring the crisis under control.

 

“When the epidemic explodes, they fight it. When it disappears, they stop,” said one vet who asked not to be named, and is convinced that the risks for humans are important.

 

The virus typically spreads from birds to humans through direct contact, but experts fear it could mutate into a form that is easily transmissible between humans, with the potential to kill millions in a pandemic.

 

Vietnam earlier in March approved a new $23 million fund to tackle the virus, with an emphasis on improving coordination between officials in the health and agricultural sectors.

 

But Patrice Gautier, a French vet who has been based in Vietnam for years, said that the virus, by its very nature, will take a long time to eradicate.

 

“This problem doesn’t go away if you just throw money at it. It will take a long, hard slog to reinforce vet services,” said Gautier, a bird flu expert.

 

According to him, Vietnam’s animal health services have started to follow the recommendations of the World Organisation for Animal Health to address weaknesses diagnosed at the height of the outbreak.

 

“It is very unlikely that you will see a new crisis emerging in Vietnam,” he said. “But it is very likely that the current situation, with a peak every winter, will persist for decades.”

Source: MOLE

Deciding when to die — with dignity

Deciding when to die — with dignity

ENSCHEDE: With a deadly dose of barbiturates stashed in his home in a small eastern Dutch town, pensioner Hans Hillebrand is a self-determinist: he alone wants to decide when it’s time to die with dignity.

 

“I want to do it myself, to be responsible for it myself,” the former business manager, 78, told AFP he was still perky and alert, loved tending his flower garden, listening to opera and reading.

 

But the day he loses his independence and the ability to participate in village life will be the day to consider going away.

 

“I shall be the director of my own final scene,” he said.

 

Hillebrand is one of a growing number of aging Dutch people who prefer to make their own decisions about when and where to die — and in a dignified way.

 

“Senior citizens today like to decide things for themselves, more than previous generations,” said Ton Vink of De Einder (The Ender in Dutch), an organisation dedicated to informing people who want to end their own lives.

 

More and more Dutch voices are being raised in support of a right to claim assistance to die with dignity after an accomplished life and not just when the requirements by law for euthanasia are fulfilled.

 

A citizens’ initiative called “An Accomplished Life” which supports the idea, has already gathered more than 117,000 signatures, more than the 40,000 required for a debate in the Dutch parliament, which was held in early March.

 

Even with the country’s liberal laws on euthanasia, a doctor still has the final say whether the criteria have been fulfilled for assisted suicide, namely unbearable and prolonged suffering caused by incurable disease.

 

But Hillebrand said: “I have no desire to go and fight” against a “wicked” disease, to be forced to live “a life in prison like a larva,” in a hospital or an old-age home.

 

The septuagenarian bought his 50 “suicide pills” illegally in the Netherlands, politely declining to say how and where — except that it was very easy.

 

When his hour arrives, whether in five, 10 or 20 years, Hillebrand, who wants to donate his body to science, has left nothing to chance: the names to go on envelopes to tell people of his demise have already been written.

 

But unlike Hillebrand, many pensioners are often unable to secure so-called suicide drugs and then choose a more radical option.

 

“Sometimes people who want to die have to end their lives in a cruel way,” by jumping off a bridge or throwing themselves underneath a train or setting themselves on fire, said Walburg de Jong, spokesman for Right-to-Die NL (NVVE).

 

A book titled “Solution” written by Dutch psychiatrist Bowdewijn Chabot and published in February 2010, explained how people could end their lives by using the necessary drugs like barbiturates, anti-depressants and opiates, as well as dosages.

 

Some 11,000 copies have been sold since.

Source: MOLE

Peguam dapat akses pada kertas mahkamah Perancis

Saman sivil NGO hak asasi Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) terhadap gergasi pertahanan tentera laut Perancis DCNS kerana didakwa membayar komisen kepada pemimpin di Malaysia mula menunjukkan perkembangan memberangsangkan.

NONEPada Khamis, peguam Suaram di Perancis memberitahu NGO itu, mereka sudah mendapat akses kepada kertas mahkamah berkaitan kes melibatkan pembelian kapal selam Scorpene bernilai RM77.3 bilion.

Pengarah Suaram Cynthia Gabriel berkata, barisan peguam mereka kini boleh mengkaji dokumen dan menasihat tindakan se;anjutnya.

“Kami bagaimanapun tidak dapat mempamerkan dokumen itu. Kami hanya boleh akses, mengkaji dan membuat rujukan terhadapnya, tetapi tidak boleh diumumkan menurut undang-undang Perancis,” katanya kepada Malaysiakini.

“Ini memang cabaran besar kepada tetapi kami berbesar hati kerana kes itu bergerak ke arah yang betul dan memberi momentum,” tambahnya.

altantuya and son 050309Dua kapal selam itu dibeli pada tahun 2002 oleh kerajaan Malaysia ketika Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak bertugas sebagai menteri pertahanan.

Perimekar, syarikat yang dikaitkan dengan Abdul Razak Baginda – orang kepercayaan Najib – dibayar 114 juta euro atau RM570 juta, untuk bertindak sebagai ‘orang tengah’ dalam urus niaga penuh kontroversi itu.

Kerajaan bagaimanapun berkata, pembayaran besar kepada Perimekar untuk perkhidmatan “koordinasi dan sokongan’.

Abdul Razak dan dua pengawal peribadi Najib didakwa membunuh Altantuya Sharibuu pada tahun 2006, tetapi selepas dibicarakan beliau kemudiannya dibebaskan, manakala dua yang lain didapati bersalah dan dihukum mati.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=22900







Posted by
on Mar 31 2012. Filed under berita.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Restricting competition doesn’t encourage higher productivity

Restricting competition doesn’t encourage higher productivity

Classical economic theory says that if you reduce the number of players in a market (really a shift in the supply curve to the left), you raise prices and reduce both quantity demanded and supplied at the market equilibrium point, thus reducing consumer surplus and social welfare. Higher prices means higher profit margins means less incentive to improve productivity. And in the context of consumer reaction, all this does is shift demand away from protected farmer’s markets and Teman outlets to retailers who are willing to carry both local and imported vegetables.

 

 

Doesn’t this move go directly against what the NEM is supposed to be about? Much less the newly minted Competition Act? Is it too much to ask for a little more plausible economic sense to be embedded in policy design?

 

Read more at ECONOMICS MALAYSIA.

Source: MOLE

Making mountains out of anthills

Making mountains out of anthills

The recent loss of breadmaking company Silver Bird Group Berhad started a political debate that stretches the political border into Riau and from fact to fiction and slander.

From the initial intention by some groups to discredit the rebellious Koperasi Felda Berhad (KPB), Nurul Izzah dragged Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) into the fray.

Husam Musa stretched his imagination into a slanderous statement of TH selling its plantation in Riau to an opposition’s crony in a hurry to cover for BN’s delayed Felda Global Venture (FGV) listing.

If an explanation is sought, Husam should not have been too detailed. It is obvious that Pakatan Rakyat, destroyers of nation-building, are on to another psywar attack on another Government institution: Tabung Haji.

If they intend to make mountains out of anthills, TH should be firm and just sue these buggers. It is not worth the trouble to get dragged into a political slugfest. Learn from Felda.

 

Read more at ANOTHER BRICK IN THE WALL.

 

(Edited by The Mole.)

Source: MOLE

Another court case, and another, and another

Another court case, and another, and another

 

Read more at OUTSYED THE BOX.

Source: MOLE

PKR rep: "Can we rule the country?"

PKR rep: “Can we rule the country?”

KUALA LUMPUR: A Pakatan Rakyat representative pondered on the coalition’s ability to rule the country when it couldn’t even resolve the seat distribution squabble in Kedah.

 

Speaking to The Mole, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Bukit Selambau assemblyman S.Manikumar said: “How can we lead the country if we cannot settle our own internal seat allocation dispute?’’

 

“Every leader can have their own views on how many State and Parliamentary seats they wish to contest, but the seat distribution must be determined by the Pakatan leadership council.’’

 

Manikumar who is Kedah state executive councillor was commenting on Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak responses in a news report stating that Pas will not be swapping seats with its Pakatan allies.

 

He was also concerned on the possibilities of three-cornered fights between the Pakatan components in some state seats in Kedah if the squabble between the Mentri Besar and state DAP chairman Lee Guan Aik persists.

 

Manikumar said, “arguing does not achieve anything.’’

 

“The decision making body on seat allocation is the coalition’s leadership and I believe the council will decide what is best for each party.’’

 

In a news report on March 26, Azizan disclosed that DAP will not be getting additional seats in the next general elections.

 

Azizan’s announcement prompted Lee to react, stating it was only right for the Pakatan leadership to intervene as he claimed there had been no compromise reached at the state level.

 

In the blog Kuala Lumpur Chronicle yesterday, Beruang Biru highlighted a statement by Lee that a failure to allocate more seats in the state to DAP would result in three-cornered fights for several seats.

 

Lee who is Kota Darul Aman assemblyman had previously said the party needed more seat allocations to remain part of the Pakatan state government.

  

“If Pas denies our request, it shows that we are not working together,” he said.

  

“We have since forwarded our requests to the Pakatan leadership council to mediate and we expect them to decide on something that will be good for all three parties.’’

 

Lee when contacted said he does not want to comment further on the matter since the dispute is being handled by the coalition’s leadership.

  

In the impending general election, DAP wants to contest in four extra state seats, Lunas, Gurun, Bakar Bata and Bakar Arang. 

 

In addition, the DAP also wants to contest in two Parliamentary seats, Padang Serai and Alor Setar.

  

In the12th general election in 2008, DAP only contested in two state seats, Kota Darulaman and Derga. It did not field any candidates in Kedah parliamentary seats then.

  


Source: MOLE

Shaik Hussein: "Bring it on Guan Eng"

Shaik Hussein: “Bring it on Guan Eng”

KUALA LUMPUR: Penang Umno Youth chief Shaik Hussein Mydin said he has ample proof to back his expose of the Penang Government selling off plots earmarked for a mosque and school in the controversial billion-ringgit Bayan Mutiara land deal.

 

Despite a looming litigation threat, Shaik Hussein told The Mole: “I am ready for this issue to be heard in court. In fact I would suggest the Penang Government to sue me on other issues surrounding this land sale too.”

 

He further said a court case will allow him to legally obtain all documents regarding the Bayan Mutiara land sale and expose them publicly.

 

“So far we have given the facts and valid documents for (Penang Chief Minister) Lim Guan Eng to answer. Why is he quiet?” Shaik Hussein said.

 

“I read various news reports to find his response including on the online portals. Instead of clarifying, Guan Eng keeps repeating his political rhetorics,” Shaik Hussein added.

 

In a news report on Wednesday Lim said that he will take legal action against Shaik Hussein for lying and Utusan Malaysia for publishing such lies with regards to the accusations.

 

Shaik Hussein viewed the threat of legal action against him as Lim’s effort to shut him up from further highlighting the controversial land sale.

 

Commenting on remarks made by several leaders from Pakatan Rakyat stating the latest allegation in Bayan Mutiara is a propaganda to mislead the people, Shaik Hussein said: “I do not get why these leaders think so.”

 

“This is a technical issue. Penang Government should not sell subdivision lands meant for construction of mosque and school. It has already been prescribed by the law,” the civil engineer explained.

 

Shaik Hussein also said no issues will arise if the DAP-led Penang Government reserved both lands meant for the mosque and school from being sold to developer, Ivory Properties Group Bhd.

 

Previously in a news report Shaik Hussein highlighted how the sale contradicted the Penang Development Corporation’s (PDC) initial plan to build those amenities as it was approved by the Pulau Pinang Municipal Council (MPPP – Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang) on Oct 30, 2006.

 

On a press statement by the Chief Minister’s political aide Zairil Khir Johari that Penang Umno should not make allegations that plots will not be allocated for the mosque and school as the new development plan has yet to be completed, Shaik Hussein said: “Zairil himself must understand that I am not saying no mosque will be built by the developer.”

 

“I am questioning why the Penang Government simply dismissed the initial development plan. If they are having this lackadaisical attitude on religious sites now, only God knows what they will do in the future.”

 

This latest allegation adds to a list of controversies surrounding the Bayan Mutiara land sale.

 

Prior to this BN’s Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan, the MP for Kota Belud, had asked Lim’s clarification regarding the sale of 41.6 hectares of land worth of RM1.2 billion by PDC to the developer.

 

Blogger SatD in his post had came up with a series of questions regarding the sale of the land by PDC as well as the conversion of the land from leasehold to freehold status.

Source: MOLE

Kyplex Cloud Security Seal - Click for Verification