Chief Minister

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

In an email to the Editor, Calvin Sankaran wrote:

 

One of the most stunning examples of the power of propaganda can be seen in a documentary by the National Geographic called “Explorer: Inside North Korea”. This documentary chronicles the adventures of a Nepalese eye doctor who performs cataract surgeries on North Koreans who had been blind since birth due to the abject poverty wrought by the policies of their totalitarian government.

 

When their bandages were finally removed and the Koreans were able to see for the first time, instead of thanking the doctor and his team who performed the surgeries, the Koreans fell to their knees and profusely thanked their Dear Leader and the North Korean President Kim Jong Il. This incident is a powerful and eye-opening demonstration that while modern medicine can cure blindness of the eyes, nothing can remove blindness of mind caused by the extensive and skilful application of political propaganda.

 

It is a mistake to think that such all-pervasive propaganda only exists in dictatorships. Noam Chomsky astutely observed that “Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state”. In Malaysia, too, the rakyat are being bombarded on a 24/7 basis with a highly-focused and intense propaganda blitz — not by Biro Tata Negara (BTN) or the Main Stream Media (MSM) as most people seem to think, but by the PR-savvy Opposition using social media and the alternative online news portals.

 

One of the most elaborate and beautiful lies that Pakatan has carefully and painstakingly constructed over the last five years is the myth that the DAP-led state government has turned Penang into a Utopian Super State where good governance reigns while poverty and corruption have been totally eradicated. Lim Guan Eng, the Chief Minister, is relentlessly heralded and branded as a Superman and a Global Statesman in the mould of Lee Kuan Yew, Mahatma Gandhi and Abraham Lincoln.

 

In truth, Penang’s much-lauded “success” is a mere mirage and the CM’s superhuman leadership abilities are as real as the Loch Ness monster, as the analysis below will clearly show. Like the Russian Minister Grigory Potemkin who constructed a fake settlement to deceive the Empress Catherine II, Penang’s image as a Super State is a fake wonderland constructed by the DAP leadership, ably supported by their horde of Cybertroopers.

 

1. Eradication of poverty

 

The greatest liars and the most successful salesmen know that the most convincing way of lying is by mixing lies with half-truths. One of the DAP’s proudest boasts is the claim that they have magically eliminated poverty in Penang. What they cleverly and cunningly conceal from their audience is that back in 2008 (when they assumed power) the incidence of hard-core poverty was a mere 0.1% and that Penang was already the second-richest state in the country.

 

Reducing the hard-core poverty from 0.1% to 0% by 2012 is hardly an achievement that is worth crowing about, especially since there were three other states that achieved “zero hard-core poverty” well before Penang.

 

2. Open tender

 

Guan Eng never fails to boast about his Open Tender policy in every ceramah, debate, forum, interview or newspaper column when he speaks about the DAP’s management superiority over BN. He credits this policy with eliminating corruption and cronyism in Penang and saving millions in public funds. Unfortunately there is a massive gap between this fiction and the reality on the ground.

 

Penang’s Open Tender policy has been so discredited, decimated and mired in endless controversies that it is seen as the DAP’s greatest liability by Penangites. The only thing open about the Open Tender system is that it is being openly abused by Lim and his minions to award multi-billion ringgit projects to their favoured developers and contractors.  

 

No one is quite sure how the system works but it has produced numerous controversial and highly-suspicious contract awards. For example, the Bayan Mutiara deal, the eSpice exhibition centre contract, and lately the Tunnel-Highway mega project have all created so much confusion, anger, opposition, bitterness and controversy in the state despite the CM claiming to have awarded the contracts via the Open Tender system. Despite being pressured by the rakyat, political parties and NGOs, the CM steadfastly and mule-headedly refuses to reveal the details on how these contracts were awarded. These contracts clearly enriched the private companies who stand to rake in billions in profits at the expense of the rakyat and the long-term benefit of the state.

 

3. Debt reduction

 

Another of Guan Eng’s Jesus-like miraculous claims is that he reduced the state’s debt by 95% from RM630 million on 8 March 2008 to RM30 million at the end of 2011. However his claim was soon to be exposed as a sham. It was revealed that the debt was reduced not due to any efforts by Guan Eng or his administration but due to a payment of RM655 million by the federal government to the state as compensation for taking over Penang’s water assets. Despite being exposed, Guan Eng continued to conceal the truth and kept up his claims on the ceramah circuit, which were lapped up by the adoring and swooning Pakatan supporters.

 

4. Anti-Corruption

 

Penang is presented as a shining example of a state free of corruption and ruled by a state administration which has “zero tolerance” for bribery and cronyism. Guan Eng markets himself as a tireless anti-corruption crusader. However, as with other claims, the reality is vastly different. What DAP leaders conveniently neglect to mention in their ceramahs is that the state’s first Deputy Chief Minister 1 (DCM1), Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin, was forced to resign in 2009 when the MACC started investigating him for corruption.

 

More recently an aide of the current DCM1 was arrested and charged for offering a bribe to a complainant to cover up a sexual harassment case. Another shocker was the arrest of Roslan Yahya, the District Offer for Seberang Prai Tengah and one of the most senior officers in the state, by the MACC.   

 

5. Asset Declaration

 

Much has been made of the public asset declarations by Guan Eng and his exco. However, this move again was heavily criticised and mocked for a lack of sincerity. Firstly, the state government took almost four years to make the asset declaration. If Lim Guan Eng and his administration are really sincere they would have done this within weeks of assuming the state’s reins back in 2008.

 

Secondly, the rushed and abrupt manner in which the declaration was made seems to indicate that it was made for political expediency and with an eye on the coming 13th General Election.

 

Thirdly, the declaration did not include the councillors’ spouses and family members. It is well known that corrupted politicians escape detection by transferring their assets to their spouses and family members.

 

Finally, it was claimed that the declaration was verified by a leading audit company. However the online version of the asset declaration did not carry any indication of this verification

 

6. Financial Management

 

Another oft-quoted and much-hyped “achievement” of Penang under Guan Eng is the state’s supposedly superior financial skills and prudence. Guan Eng even claimed that the Auditor-General (AG) had commended Penang as the best-managed state in the country. The only problem with the statement is that the AG never made the commendation, nor has Penang been shown to be the best-managed state in the nation.

 

In fact, the DAP government conveniently omits some very worrying points highlighted and uncovered in the 2011 AG’s Report. The most stunning revelation was that the state government’s spending has ballooned by a shocking 84 percent over the last five years! Such reckless wastage and uncontrolled spending of public funds is certainly not a mark of a prudent and responsible government at all. At this rate, the state’s spending will overtake its income. At the current rate of spending increase it is estimated that in another four years the state will go bankrupt!

 

Another major expose in the AG Report was the sources of income for the state. LGE has been in chest-beating mode about how Penang has increased its income by leaps and bounds. However the AG’s Report lays bare this claim by revealing that most of the state’s income is derived from land-related sales and tax-related matters. This means by selling off state land, increasing development costs and other land-related fees, the state has managed to hike up its revenues rather than as “the dividends of anti-corruption measures”.

 

Another of Guan Eng’s so-called achievements was the surplus budget of the state for the last three years. Of all the CM’s boasts, this is the only valid claim – on the surface. However, a budget surplus does not by itself equate with financial skills but very often indicates accounting chicanery. The trick that Guan Eng employs to fool people is easy to spot since it has been often utilised in financial shenanigans in the business world to defraud investors. What he does every year is to table a huge deficit budget – for example for the year 2013 he is planning for a deficit budget of RM213million. And then he spends less than the monstrously inflated budget and then claims to hit a surplus at the year’s end and voila! He’s a genius!

 

7. Investment ranking

 

Guan Eng has been quick to congratulate himself for the fact that Penang was ranked number one in Malaysia for the year 2009 and 2010 in attracting investment. While there is no disputing this fact, the real question is about who is actually responsible for this feat. It is a known fact in the industry that the state’s investment procurement was entirely due to the efforts of the federal government and MIDA as well as Guan Eng’s predecessor Koh Tsu Khoon. It is also a known fact that Lim’s administration has failed to attract even a single major investor to the state during the last five years. As such it was no surprise that Penang fell to number six in the investment ranking in 2012 and will likely plunge further this year. The drop in the amount of investment received was a shocking 73 percent!

 

8. Good Governance

 

One of the key themes of the Pakatan coalition and the DAP is democratic rights. Winning Penang gave the DAP a perfect opportunity and platform to introduce democratic practices and policies in administrating the state. Instead of looking at the best practices of the more advanced democracies, Guan Eng has elected to Look East and has copied the North Korean model of dynastic dictatorship. The CM runs the state like a despot with him as Penang’s Dear Leader controlling every aspect of the government. The Deputy CMs and the rest of the Exco are mere puppets and rubber stamps to the CM. He has cultivated a cult of personality and bulldozes his decisions through the rubber-stamp State Assembly and Exco. Anyone who dares to question Lim is hounded and mercilessly attacked by the DAP’s highly-organised “Brown-Shirts” – the thuggish supporters and cyber-troopers.

 

9. Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT)

 

Guan Eng’s mantra of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT) has been his trademark since he first assumed the post of CM. While he has been ceaselessly promoting this CAT slogan, it has remained a mere marketing gimmick and political rhetoric rather than ever being put into practice. We have seen the numerous blunders of LGE’s government that completely negated his claim of “competency”. Guan Eng’s penchant for quickly claiming credit for the achievements of others while blaming his predecessor, BN/UMNO and the Federal government is a well-known fact. 

 

There has never been a case where Guan Eng has admitted to his mistakes and apologised. In transparency, too, he has failed to live up to his hype. Despite his promise of making government records public, he has so far only released partial minutes of meetings, and even that is only the records of the previous government. He has refused on many occasions to release minutes of his exco meetings, contents of contentious contracts or other details. As such, CAT remains as a mere political marketing slogan with a bite.

 

10. Local council elections

 

Despite promising to restore the local government elections in their manifesto for the 2008 General Election, the DAP administration failed to carry out its pledge by employing its typical modus operandi – dishing out excuses and playing the blame game. First it formed a Working Group (WG) to study the feasibility of holding the polls. Why the state government would need to conduct the study is a puzzle since the DAP had been claiming for years that the law allows local council elections and even included it in the election manifesto. Unsurprisingly the WG concluded that the law doesn’t allow for such elections and ridiculously recommended that the state government should pass the motion in the state assembly urging the federal government to enact laws to allow it.

 

In another equally asinine and laughable move, Guan Eng wrote to the EC requesting it conduct the elections. The EC replied, unsurprisingly, that it couldn’t do so legally so under the existing law but told Penang to go ahead and hold the polls themselves. However, in order to confuse people and avoid holding the election, Guan Eng kept giving excuse after excuse. When he ran out of excuses he went ahead and passed a law at the state assembly on local government elections, knowing full well that this was against not just the law but also common sense.

 

A few weeks ago, when it was clear that the GE was around the corner, he dramatically filed a petition in the Federal Court to allow the state the right to hold local council elections. That Guan Eng has no intention of ever restoring the Third Vote is crystal clear. If he were really serious in his intentions he could have done it long ago. It is a shocking fact that there are more political appointees in MPPP and MPSP (the local councils of Penang) now under Guan Eng’s administration than during his predecessor’s reign. In fact Guan Eng treats MPPP and MPSP as his personal fiefdom and an extension of his administration, which can be seen from numerous episodes. As such, independently-elected local councils would not serve his interests and political games.

 

I am sure that many Penangites will agree with the following personality analysis that seems to describe the leadership style of the Penang Chief Minister very succinctly and accurately: “His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”

Source: MOLE

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

In an email to the Editor, Calvin Sankaran wrote:

 

One of the most stunning examples of the power of propaganda can be seen in a documentary by the National Geographic called “Explorer: Inside North Korea”. This documentary chronicles the adventures of a Nepalese eye doctor who performs cataract surgeries on North Koreans who had been blind since birth due to the abject poverty wrought by the policies of their totalitarian government.

 

When their bandages were finally removed and the Koreans were able to see for the first time, instead of thanking the doctor and his team who performed the surgeries, the Koreans fell to their knees and profusely thanked their Dear Leader and the North Korean President Kim Jong Il. This incident is a powerful and eye-opening demonstration that while modern medicine can cure blindness of the eyes, nothing can remove blindness of mind caused by the extensive and skilful application of political propaganda.

 

It is a mistake to think that such all-pervasive propaganda only exists in dictatorships. Noam Chomsky astutely observed that “Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state”. In Malaysia, too, the rakyat are being bombarded on a 24/7 basis with a highly-focused and intense propaganda blitz — not by Biro Tata Negara (BTN) or the Main Stream Media (MSM) as most people seem to think, but by the PR-savvy Opposition using social media and the alternative online news portals.

 

One of the most elaborate and beautiful lies that Pakatan has carefully and painstakingly constructed over the last five years is the myth that the DAP-led state government has turned Penang into a Utopian Super State where good governance reigns while poverty and corruption have been totally eradicated. Lim Guan Eng, the Chief Minister, is relentlessly heralded and branded as a Superman and a Global Statesman in the mould of Lee Kuan Yew, Mahatma Gandhi and Abraham Lincoln.

 

In truth, Penang’s much-lauded “success” is a mere mirage and the CM’s superhuman leadership abilities are as real as the Loch Ness monster, as the analysis below will clearly show. Like the Russian Minister Grigory Potemkin who constructed a fake settlement to deceive the Empress Catherine II, Penang’s image as a Super State is a fake wonderland constructed by the DAP leadership, ably supported by their horde of Cybertroopers.

 

1. Eradication of poverty

 

The greatest liars and the most successful salesmen know that the most convincing way of lying is by mixing lies with half-truths. One of the DAP’s proudest boasts is the claim that they have magically eliminated poverty in Penang. What they cleverly and cunningly conceal from their audience is that back in 2008 (when they assumed power) the incidence of hard-core poverty was a mere 0.1% and that Penang was already the second-richest state in the country.

 

Reducing the hard-core poverty from 0.1% to 0% by 2012 is hardly an achievement that is worth crowing about, especially since there were three other states that achieved “zero hard-core poverty” well before Penang.

 

2. Open tender

 

Guan Eng never fails to boast about his Open Tender policy in every ceramah, debate, forum, interview or newspaper column when he speaks about the DAP’s management superiority over BN. He credits this policy with eliminating corruption and cronyism in Penang and saving millions in public funds. Unfortunately there is a massive gap between this fiction and the reality on the ground.

 

Penang’s Open Tender policy has been so discredited, decimated and mired in endless controversies that it is seen as the DAP’s greatest liability by Penangites. The only thing open about the Open Tender system is that it is being openly abused by Lim and his minions to award multi-billion ringgit projects to their favoured developers and contractors.  

 

No one is quite sure how the system works but it has produced numerous controversial and highly-suspicious contract awards. For example, the Bayan Mutiara deal, the eSpice exhibition centre contract, and lately the Tunnel-Highway mega project have all created so much confusion, anger, opposition, bitterness and controversy in the state despite the CM claiming to have awarded the contracts via the Open Tender system. Despite being pressured by the rakyat, political parties and NGOs, the CM steadfastly and mule-headedly refuses to reveal the details on how these contracts were awarded. These contracts clearly enriched the private companies who stand to rake in billions in profits at the expense of the rakyat and the long-term benefit of the state.

 

3. Debt reduction

 

Another of Guan Eng’s Jesus-like miraculous claims is that he reduced the state’s debt by 95% from RM630 million on 8 March 2008 to RM30 million at the end of 2011. However his claim was soon to be exposed as a sham. It was revealed that the debt was reduced not due to any efforts by Guan Eng or his administration but due to a payment of RM655 million by the federal government to the state as compensation for taking over Penang’s water assets. Despite being exposed, Guan Eng continued to conceal the truth and kept up his claims on the ceramah circuit, which were lapped up by the adoring and swooning Pakatan supporters.

 

4. Anti-Corruption

 

Penang is presented as a shining example of a state free of corruption and ruled by a state administration which has “zero tolerance” for bribery and cronyism. Guan Eng markets himself as a tireless anti-corruption crusader. However, as with other claims, the reality is vastly different. What DAP leaders conveniently neglect to mention in their ceramahs is that the state’s first Deputy Chief Minister 1 (DCM1), Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin, was forced to resign in 2009 when the MACC started investigating him for corruption.

 

More recently an aide of the current DCM1 was arrested and charged for offering a bribe to a complainant to cover up a sexual harassment case. Another shocker was the arrest of Roslan Yahya, the District Offer for Seberang Prai Tengah and one of the most senior officers in the state, by the MACC.   

 

5. Asset Declaration

 

Much has been made of the public asset declarations by Guan Eng and his exco. However, this move again was heavily criticised and mocked for a lack of sincerity. Firstly, the state government took almost four years to make the asset declaration. If Lim Guan Eng and his administration are really sincere they would have done this within weeks of assuming the state’s reins back in 2008.

 

Secondly, the rushed and abrupt manner in which the declaration was made seems to indicate that it was made for political expediency and with an eye on the coming 13th General Election.

 

Thirdly, the declaration did not include the councillors’ spouses and family members. It is well known that corrupted politicians escape detection by transferring their assets to their spouses and family members.

 

Finally, it was claimed that the declaration was verified by a leading audit company. However the online version of the asset declaration did not carry any indication of this verification

 

6. Financial Management

 

Another oft-quoted and much-hyped “achievement” of Penang under Guan Eng is the state’s supposedly superior financial skills and prudence. Guan Eng even claimed that the Auditor-General (AG) had commended Penang as the best-managed state in the country. The only problem with the statement is that the AG never made the commendation, nor has Penang been shown to be the best-managed state in the nation.

 

In fact, the DAP government conveniently omits some very worrying points highlighted and uncovered in the 2011 AG’s Report. The most stunning revelation was that the state government’s spending has ballooned by a shocking 84 percent over the last five years! Such reckless wastage and uncontrolled spending of public funds is certainly not a mark of a prudent and responsible government at all. At this rate, the state’s spending will overtake its income. At the current rate of spending increase it is estimated that in another four years the state will go bankrupt!

 

Another major expose in the AG Report was the sources of income for the state. LGE has been in chest-beating mode about how Penang has increased its income by leaps and bounds. However the AG’s Report lays bare this claim by revealing that most of the state’s income is derived from land-related sales and tax-related matters. This means by selling off state land, increasing development costs and other land-related fees, the state has managed to hike up its revenues rather than as “the dividends of anti-corruption measures”.

 

Another of Guan Eng’s so-called achievements was the surplus budget of the state for the last three years. Of all the CM’s boasts, this is the only valid claim – on the surface. However, a budget surplus does not by itself equate with financial skills but very often indicates accounting chicanery. The trick that Guan Eng employs to fool people is easy to spot since it has been often utilised in financial shenanigans in the business world to defraud investors. What he does every year is to table a huge deficit budget – for example for the year 2013 he is planning for a deficit budget of RM213million. And then he spends less than the monstrously inflated budget and then claims to hit a surplus at the year’s end and voila! He’s a genius!

 

7. Investment ranking

 

Guan Eng has been quick to congratulate himself for the fact that Penang was ranked number one in Malaysia for the year 2009 and 2010 in attracting investment. While there is no disputing this fact, the real question is about who is actually responsible for this feat. It is a known fact in the industry that the state’s investment procurement was entirely due to the efforts of the federal government and MIDA as well as Guan Eng’s predecessor Koh Tsu Khoon. It is also a known fact that Lim’s administration has failed to attract even a single major investor to the state during the last five years. As such it was no surprise that Penang fell to number six in the investment ranking in 2012 and will likely plunge further this year. The drop in the amount of investment received was a shocking 73 percent!

 

8. Good Governance

 

One of the key themes of the Pakatan coalition and the DAP is democratic rights. Winning Penang gave the DAP a perfect opportunity and platform to introduce democratic practices and policies in administrating the state. Instead of looking at the best practices of the more advanced democracies, Guan Eng has elected to Look East and has copied the North Korean model of dynastic dictatorship. The CM runs the state like a despot with him as Penang’s Dear Leader controlling every aspect of the government. The Deputy CMs and the rest of the Exco are mere puppets and rubber stamps to the CM. He has cultivated a cult of personality and bulldozes his decisions through the rubber-stamp State Assembly and Exco. Anyone who dares to question Lim is hounded and mercilessly attacked by the DAP’s highly-organised “Brown-Shirts” – the thuggish supporters and cyber-troopers.

 

9. Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT)

 

Guan Eng’s mantra of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT) has been his trademark since he first assumed the post of CM. While he has been ceaselessly promoting this CAT slogan, it has remained a mere marketing gimmick and political rhetoric rather than ever being put into practice. We have seen the numerous blunders of LGE’s government that completely negated his claim of “competency”. Guan Eng’s penchant for quickly claiming credit for the achievements of others while blaming his predecessor, BN/UMNO and the Federal government is a well-known fact. 

 

There has never been a case where Guan Eng has admitted to his mistakes and apologised. In transparency, too, he has failed to live up to his hype. Despite his promise of making government records public, he has so far only released partial minutes of meetings, and even that is only the records of the previous government. He has refused on many occasions to release minutes of his exco meetings, contents of contentious contracts or other details. As such, CAT remains as a mere political marketing slogan with a bite.

 

10. Local council elections

 

Despite promising to restore the local government elections in their manifesto for the 2008 General Election, the DAP administration failed to carry out its pledge by employing its typical modus operandi – dishing out excuses and playing the blame game. First it formed a Working Group (WG) to study the feasibility of holding the polls. Why the state government would need to conduct the study is a puzzle since the DAP had been claiming for years that the law allows local council elections and even included it in the election manifesto. Unsurprisingly the WG concluded that the law doesn’t allow for such elections and ridiculously recommended that the state government should pass the motion in the state assembly urging the federal government to enact laws to allow it.

 

In another equally asinine and laughable move, Guan Eng wrote to the EC requesting it conduct the elections. The EC replied, unsurprisingly, that it couldn’t do so legally so under the existing law but told Penang to go ahead and hold the polls themselves. However, in order to confuse people and avoid holding the election, Guan Eng kept giving excuse after excuse. When he ran out of excuses he went ahead and passed a law at the state assembly on local government elections, knowing full well that this was against not just the law but also common sense.

 

A few weeks ago, when it was clear that the GE was around the corner, he dramatically filed a petition in the Federal Court to allow the state the right to hold local council elections. That Guan Eng has no intention of ever restoring the Third Vote is crystal clear. If he were really serious in his intentions he could have done it long ago. It is a shocking fact that there are more political appointees in MPPP and MPSP (the local councils of Penang) now under Guan Eng’s administration than during his predecessor’s reign. In fact Guan Eng treats MPPP and MPSP as his personal fiefdom and an extension of his administration, which can be seen from numerous episodes. As such, independently-elected local councils would not serve his interests and political games.

 

I am sure that many Penangites will agree with the following personality analysis that seems to describe the leadership style of the Penang Chief Minister very succinctly and accurately: “His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”

Source: MOLE

What do the DAP and race car drivers have in common?

What do the DAP and race car drivers have in common?

In an email to the Editor, Wong Saikim wrote: 

 

What do political leaders and racing car drivers have in common? They are both in a race of sorts.  The politicians want to win at the polls, and the racing drivers want to win at the Grand Prix.  

 

But the DAP and ace driver Lewis Hamilton had one more thing in common — they each suffered crushing, embarrassing moments this week. 

 

Hamilton’s embarrassment happened at the race track in Sepang last week. The  Formula One racer made a blunder when he pulled in at the McLaren pit stop instead of the Mercedes box. For one brief moment, he had forgotten that McLaren was his previous sponsor and Mercedes was his current. Describing this gaffe, a foreign correspondent said that Hamilton was usually drawn to controversy like a moth to a lampshade.   

 

His old McLaren mechanics were briefly stunned but his fans couldn’t hide a big smile at the blooper. To them, it was no big deal. They were just amused. 

 

The DAP’s embarrassment happened a few days ago. The DAP admitted to a faux pas of gigantic proportions. The Penang DAP government admitted that there has been a mistake in the entire costs for the mega project involving the undersea tunnel and the three highways. The earlier costs were under-reported by RM2.22 billion. Not by RM2.22, not by RM2.22 hundred, not by RM2.22 thousand, not by RM2.22 million, but by a staggering RM2.22 billion! 

 

The error was dismissed as a ‘typo’. But unlike the case of Lewis Hamilton, the rakyat are not so forgiving. They are not amused. How can anyone, let alone a government,  make such a boo-boo?  What rocket fuel was used to propel the costs sky-high? 

 

Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng cannot dismiss this mother of all blunders as a mere ‘typo’. A ‘typo’ is a typographical error which only happened in the days when manual typewriters were in use. Typewriters have long given way to computers which always flag mistakes as they occur, and prompt corrections.  

 

The rakyat demand a detailed explanation.  After all, it is they who are finally going to foot the bill, one way or another. 

 

Whatever happened to Competency, Accountability and Transparency? Why is the DAP silent? Has the CAT got its tongue? 

 

This was not the DAP’s first blooper. The party could not even get it right in its elections to its party Central Executive Committee last December. A ‘technical error’ in calculation resulted in an inaccurate result.

 

Candidate number 65 Zairil Abdullah, who had the same number of votes received by candidate number 35 Manogaran Marimuthu (305 votes), actually received 803 votes, the party only claimed two weeks after the election. 

 

These are serious mistakes. If a student makes mistakes like these in school, he will be punished by his examiners; if an adult makes mistakes like these at work, he will be punished by his employer; and when politicians make mistakes like these they should be punished by the voters.

Source: MOLE

Undilah Kita Semua

20130403-204645.jpg

This afternoon the Prime Minister announced the dissolution of Parliament to make way for the long-awaited 13th General Elections. For those who never watched black and white television, this is the second time that we have called for the General Elections after the dissolution of state assemblies. The first was in 1974. So, this is nothing new.

In the last General Elections, Barisan Nasional lost badly compared to its 2004 sweep simply because it got big-headed and complacent, and its leaders felt over-confident in another landslide majority. This complacency was evident in the BK5 and K10 machineries that performed its task to gauge the voters by not actually going down to the ground. This act was dubbed “Ops Tiarap” or doing something while lying on one’s stomach. This time around, I cringe whenever someone from Barisan Nasional announces that he is confident that so and so state would be won back by Barisan Nasional.

Najib, as Prime Minister, had inherited a badly-beaten Barisan Nasional from his predecessor a year after the elections. His predecessor seemed reluctant to step down, and was viewed by many as being in a state of denial of captaining Barisan into the biggest slap it has ever received. Therefore, Najib had four years to transform the image of Barisan Nasional into one that is respected by many again.

As for the Pakatan Rakyat, it started off well in a way, even Lim Guan Eng, as the Chief Minister of Penang had offered Barisan Nasional representatives to help out in managing state-related affairs. However, after a while you see the true colours of the loose coalition, especially in the states of Perak, Selangor and Penang. You see the ones who are actually in control of these states are from DAP. DAP ruled Perak and Selangor by proxy, and this is the manner in which Malaysia would be governed should the Pakatan Rakyat win this election. You can read more of this in one of my previous postings, Taken For A Ride. DAP’s attempts to portray itself as a multiracial party fell flat on its face when all the Malay candidates who vied for a seat in the party’s Central Executive Committees were rejected by the Chinese-majority delegates. Declaring there was a problem with the Excel sheet it used for the elections a month and a half later, DAP declared that the Malays actually have an elected representative in the form of one Zairil Khir Johari, who is not even a Malay.

PAS has its own set of problems when it is seen as not being able to overcome its fear of Big Brother DAP, so much so that many of its reps blatantly kowtow to the demands of the DAP. This is even more evident when PAS did nothing to condemn the efforts by Christians to proselytise Malay Muslims.. It is no secret whatsoever as to who are the non-Christians among the DAP leadership. And it is not difficult to amend the Federal Constitution when it comes to the special position of the Rajas and Sultans, the Malays, and Islam as the religion of the Federation. I shall explain this in the next paragraph.

In the process of the enactment of law, a Minister will draw a bill with the help of the Attorney-General’s Department. This bill is then passed to all Members of Parliament (MPs). This bill will go through three readings and a study by a Dewan Select Committee. On the first reading, a Minister reads a brief subject matter of the bill to the Dewan Rakyat and the House Secretary. On the second reading, this bill is debated extensively, after which the Dewan Select Committee will study it further and make amendments where necessary. On the third reading, this bill is voted by the MPs. If it attains a 2/3 support, it is considered as passed.

This bill is then read in the Dewan Negara through the same number of reading and process. Upon passing the bill, it is then given to the Yang DiPertuan Agong (Agong) for His Majesty’s consent. His Majesty has 30 days to give consent or reject the bill. If the bill is rejected by His Majesty, then the Dewan Rakyat will have to debate the bill again and pass it. His Majesty will have another 30 days to give his consent. If His Majesty does not give consent to the bill during this second round of 30 days, the bill automatically becomes a law.

Therefore, the fear felt by Muslim Malays do not come unfounded, as evident in the pictures below:

20130403-214857.jpg

20130403-214918.jpg

20130403-214935.jpg

20130403-214948.jpg

And the most worrying part about the politics of hate advocated by the Pakatan Rakyat is this:

20130403-215045.jpg

As for the PKR, in my opinion it will fare worse off as compared to the previous elections, that its de facto leader, has announced abandoning his voters in Permatang Pauh, to contest in Perak instead.

Among the three parties that make up the loose coalition, DAP will reign supreme. PKR will emerge as the biggest loser.

How would the states fare?

Kelantan: despite the BN gaining more seats, it is in my opinion that Kelantan will remain in PAS’s hands.

Terengganu: it will be a close call as in the previous elections, with BN still holding on to it.

Pahang: Pahang will still remain a BN state.

Sabah: with Yong Teck Lee going around telling voters how Anwar Ibrahim tried to subjugate the state, and the Pakatan Rakyat links to those behind the Lahad Datu armed incursion, Sabah will still be in BN’s hands. But the local parties will give Barisan a run for the money.

Johor: DAP will make a few more gains here, especially in the urban seats, but BN will still retain this state.

Melaka and Negeri Sembilan: will remain in the hands of the Barisan Nasional.

Selangor: despite the efforts of the Barisan Nasional, I opine that it will remain in the hands of the Pakatan Rakyat. However, I believe that DAP will have a Menteri Besar-designate from their ranks this time instead of having to rely on rulingbthe state by proxy again. PKR will lose badly in this state.

Perak: this will be another state that will have a close call. The jury is still out on this one, and the same goes for Kedah.

Penang: with the gentrification of Penang, the half-island state will remain in DAP’s hands. And when I say DAP, I mean the other two parties will not fare well this time.

Of course, the above is just my opinion, and I stand corrected. The outcome may be different.

However, do not experiment with your children’s future. Your decision this round will determine the course for their future.

Be careful and be wise with your choice. If you snooze, your children lose.

Marilah Kita Mengundi.

Sarawak needs a Federal Government that understands

Sarawak needs a Federal Government that understands – Taib

In the last instalment of a candid interview with Sarawak Chief Minister Pehin Seri Abdul Taib Mahmud, he spoke about the political reality in the state and its direction in the future.

 

“Sarawak is undergoing a very aggressive economic policy. We need a Federal Government that understands our process of development,” Taib said. He also expressed his doubts whether any opposition leaders will have the expertise in bringing the development in Sarawak especially in regards to its economic and social development.

 

 

Q: How many parliamentary seats do you think Barisan Nasional can manage to win in the next election?

 

A: I think the lowest would be 23 and the highest would be 27. We are estimating this based on the political reality today. Maybe in the urban areas it looks like as if the opposition is getting some support but it (support) is not for PKR (Parti Keadilan Rakyat). PKR is not welcome here. DAP is quite aggressive and they are also trying to make inroads into the Iban community. (Editor’s Note: Sarawak has a total of 31 parliamentary seats)

 

Q: In the Peninsular, the issue of word “Allah” is a hot issue among Muslims. The impact is quite heavy on Pas. However there are people in the Peninsular who think that this issue will bring negative impact to BN as DAP is trying to make this a religious issue in Sarawak. Is it really happening here?

 

A: DAP will be wasting their time. There will be no support on this. The Sarawakians have accepted this issue for the past 50 years. There are a lot of Christians in Sarawak who bought bibles from Indonesia and they have used the translation of the word “God” to “Allah” as part of their faith. Muslims in Sarawak do not feel affected by it. I don’t see why anyone would want to create an issue out of this.

 

If DAP wants to create an issue about it here, I feel DAP is a group of people who simply want to incite hatred among Sarawakians to fight among themselves. To me, this is verging on racial politics. I look upon this kind of politics very, very severely.

 

Q: In the Sibu by-election there were problems to address the issue of NCR (Native Customary Land) land? What is the update on the NCR land?

 

A: It is indeed a hot topic before the state election. However it is not a popular issue anymore. This is because we asked for proof of any NCR lands which had been taken away by the government. When we took some of the lands, it was gazzetted for the purpose of building schools, roads and other government projects.

 

What actually happened was several NGOs had given inaccurate information to the people. This is done to support certain parties who wanted to claim bigger lands than theirs. To me, I can’t make my own decision. It needed to be settled in courts. Most of them today are quite angry when the court decided that their claims were baseless.

 

Q: In one of (opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) Anwar’s promises if he wins in the next general election, he said 15 per cent oil royalty will be given to the people of Sarawak. What is your take on that?

 

 

A: When he was a Cabinet minister in the government, he was singing a different tune.

Anwar’s record with Sarawak is very clear. It tells us on how much regards he had on us. We were given funds by the Federal Government, under his purview (as Finance Minister), to build a university, Unimas. We had to set up a temporary building for more than 10 years because Anwar took the funds and chanelled it elsewhere. To me, I don’t trust a person like this.

 

Secondly there were a lot of projects which he promised to the people in Kuching but none of it has materialised.

 

Thirdly, outside Sarawak…on the international scene, he said he disagreed with having oil palm plantations along our coastal swampy areas. If the Malays in Sarawak were to find out that Anwar objected to this, they will be upset with him. This is due to the fact that the coastal populace enjoyed better living due to the existence of oil palm plantations in their area.

 

If Pakatan wins, together with their promises, this state will be bankrupt. The oil royalty promise is just a sweet promise that doesn’t come from the heart.

 

Q: Anwar is selling himself as the saviour of the country. Does he have the qualities to provide the leadership?

 

A: The greatest test for Anwar was during the 1997 financial crisis. We look at his reaction in following standard developing countries’ reaction when we had economic crisis. He called the International Monetary Fund, and the IMF will straight away say: “You pay your debts or the money go to New York or wherever.” If we were to do that, as some of the countries in the region did, we would have lost a lot of employments and our economy would have gone bust.

 

But as we know, we passed through 1997 without being hurt too much as opposed to some other countries. You ask why? The reason is very simple, the then Prime Minister said, “I don’t want Anwar’s solution. I don’t want IMF to come. I have a Malaysian solution.”

 

We didn’t want to impoverish our country. What we need to do was to manage our supply of money and our capital flow and that’s what Tun Dr Mahathir did. I think this approach is even endorsed by developed countries. Even in the European crisis today some of them think Tun Dr Mahathir was right.

 

Anwar never thought what would happen to Malaysia. He’s got good relationships with his friends outside (IMF, World Bank and the rest). His focus was to please them first and not what he can do for the country.

To me a person like this is not immersed in fighting for his own people.

 

When asked how do we remember Anwar in Sarawak for his tenure as Federal Minister, as Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister? We would reply, “do not ask anything on what he has left for us, I think what we have now will be gone too.” Just use the case of funds meant for Unimas as an example. As far as Sarawak is concerned, Anwar did not look after Sarawak. I hope he does not become the Prime Minister.

 

Q: What is the progress of Score (Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy) now, after almost five years?

 

 

A: Score started its operations only about two years. Almost 30 big companies have applied to build factories in Samalaju. Five factories have been built and the rest are at different stages including planning and so on.

 

Based on these applications, it is beyond my expectation. We thought of having only 1000ha of land for these purposes but it is not enough. I have to allocate 6000ha in Samalaju for this. Currently a port has been built and there is one operating factory in the area.

 

We will see a lot of positive developments and responses for the upcoming years. I was quite worried at first with the global financial crisis but so far everything moving well.

 

Q: Recently Malaysian Airlines bought a substantial number of aircrafts for Mas Wings service. It shows that demand for rural domestic flight is growing. Having said that, in 2015, Asean open-sky policy will come in. How will Sarawak government react or respond to this policy and new airlines like Malindo Air in the region?

 

A: Probably the open-sky policy will be a challenge. But liberalising airline policy has its good and bad, but in the end the airlines know how to survive.

 

In the case of Sarawak, we are looking for more entry from outsiders to Sarawak and it will give greater accessibility to the state. I don’t know what the new policy is…whether we will handle it or Mas will take over, it doesn’t matter to me. What is more important is we take advantage of getting linked with the outside world.

 

Q: When are you expected to finalise the list of candidates?

 

 

A: All of these things are in the PM’s hands. As far as PBB (Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu) is concerned, it’s okay… we have decided since last year. In SDPD (Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party) there’s a lot of movement so PM has got to decide. PRS (Parti Rakyat Sarawak), I think there’s only one problem. SUPP (Sarawak United People’s Party), the list of their candidates is about to be finalised.

 

Q: Any specific message to the people in Sarawak for the upcoming election?

 

 

A: The Opposition tries to sell the idea that there should be change. That they (Opposition) are able to take over the government. It’s a normal line. But the people of Sarawak have got to be convinced whether the change is for the better or not. As far as I’m concerned we cannot afford to have a Federal Government that is led by people who have less than proven ability.

 

To us, Datuk Pattinggi Najib (Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak) is the best candidate for PM at the moment. I don’t think we should look beyond that.

 

If we think he’s the best person to become the Prime Minister, as far as Sarawak is concerned, we’ve got to go give all the best votes for him. He has proved to be much more sympathetic to the problems of Sarawak.

In fact by giving Sarawak and Sabah RM 5 billion to catch up with the demand for rural roads, electricity and water supply, we have more or less covered all the areas in rural Sarawak.

 

Because of that I think the PM will get a great deal of support among the rural people of Sarawak. He’s very sympathetic to Baram which was an area that suffered some difficulties because of its infrastructure which led to migration of a lot of educated people to Miri.

 

I think it’s quite natural while we are taking steps to have long-term big development in Baram area, we have to do something within the next 20 years.

 

By having to develop Baram as one of the areas to produce electricity for Score, we have a big project that can allow us to plan for much bolder steps to change the character of development in Baram.

 

Today Baram is still dependent on timber and lately palm oil but there’s sufficient development in Baram area to support good employment opportunities. We have identified the area where the first dam will be sited and around the dam I see there’s enough development to support about 3,000 to 4,000 employment opportunities.

 

If we can build the township (in Baram), instead of tackling Baram’s resettlement problem we build a township like what we did for Bakun. It will be a healthy development.

 

While we can’t stop the migration of well-educated people completely from Baram like most rural areas, it will create opportunities for the educated people to come back. That to me is very important and that can only be done by having a development that is focused on the creation of the new town.

 

That’s why in Sarawak, the state government has decided to build a town near the dam. It’s an approach that’s been regarded as exciting by community leaders in Baram itself and they are welcoming it very much. I think this will be a good way to show that BN is always ahead to see what can be done to enhance the development potential of Sarawak itself. With the support of the Federal Government, this will bring about restructuring of basic problems in Sarawak, namely the distribution of the population.

 

I think the same approach is welcomed in Kapit because we also feel that border areas cannot afford to lose the population too much as we need a secure border for the future.

 

When we face this election we are going to see more forward thinking in the context of Sarawak because we have a good Prime Minister who can understand this kind of thing. I doubt whether someone in Pakatan Pembangkang will be able to produce that level of vision, expertise in economic and social development.

 

We know most of the leaders in Opposition, we cannot see anybody from them who can see this level of development for Sarawak even if we can get along with them. That’s the outlook that we have from the Sarawak perspective.

 

Q: What is your message to the people of Sarawak and the people of Malaysia in general? What are your plans for the state?

 

A: To the people of Sarawak, Sarawak is undergoing very aggressive economic policy. Score will require a lot of infrastructures. We need quite a lot of development that it will be heavier for Sarawak to shoulder alone. We need a Federal Government that understands our process of development.

 

I would say let’s elect experienced leaders. At least they have been brought up in the surrounding of development planning and execution as it has been imbued in our system.

 

It has been adopted by our various leaders and refined from time to time by our Prime Ministers. The best people are the people in Barisan Nasional to do this. I don’t think anybody from the Opposition has that kind of long-term views and practical experience. 

 

This concludes of interview with Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud, the Chief Minister of Sarawak.

Source: MOLE

Sarawak needs a Federal Government that understands

Sarawak needs a Federal Government that understands – Taib

In the last instalment of a candid interview with Sarawak Chief Minister Pehin Seri Abdul Taib Mahmud, he spoke about the political reality in the state and its direction in the future.

 

“Sarawak is undergoing a very aggressive economic policy. We need a Federal Government that understands our process of development,” Taib said. He also expressed his doubts whether any opposition leaders will have the expertise in bringing the development in Sarawak especially in regards to its economic and social development.

 

 

Q: How many parliamentary seats do you think Barisan Nasional can manage to win in the next election?

 

A: I think the lowest would be 23 and the highest would be 27. We are estimating this based on the political reality today. Maybe in the urban areas it looks like as if the opposition is getting some support but it (support) is not for PKR (Parti Keadilan Rakyat). PKR is not welcome here. DAP is quite aggressive and they are also trying to make inroads into the Iban community. (Editor’s Note: Sarawak has a total of 31 parliamentary seats)

 

Q: In the Peninsular, the issue of word “Allah” is a hot issue among Muslims. The impact is quite heavy on Pas. However there are people in the Peninsular who think that this issue will bring negative impact to BN as DAP is trying to make this a religious issue in Sarawak. Is it really happening here?

 

A: DAP will be wasting their time. There will be no support on this. The Sarawakians have accepted this issue for the past 50 years. There are a lot of Christians in Sarawak who bought bibles from Indonesia and they have used the translation of the word “God” to “Allah” as part of their faith. Muslims in Sarawak do not feel affected by it. I don’t see why anyone would want to create an issue out of this.

 

If DAP wants to create an issue about it here, I feel DAP is a group of people who simply want to incite hatred among Sarawakians to fight among themselves. To me, this is verging on racial politics. I look upon this kind of politics very, very severely.

 

Q: In the Sibu by-election there were problems to address the issue of NCR (Native Customary Land) land? What is the update on the NCR land?

 

A: It is indeed a hot topic before the state election. However it is not a popular issue anymore. This is because we asked for proof of any NCR lands which had been taken away by the government. When we took some of the lands, it was gazzetted for the purpose of building schools, roads and other government projects.

 

What actually happened was several NGOs had given inaccurate information to the people. This is done to support certain parties who wanted to claim bigger lands than theirs. To me, I can’t make my own decision. It needed to be settled in courts. Most of them today are quite angry when the court decided that their claims were baseless.

 

Q: In one of (opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) Anwar’s promises if he wins in the next general election, he said 15 per cent oil royalty will be given to the people of Sarawak. What is your take on that?

 

 

A: When he was a Cabinet minister in the government, he was singing a different tune.

Anwar’s record with Sarawak is very clear. It tells us on how much regards he had on us. We were given funds by the Federal Government, under his purview (as Finance Minister), to build a university, Unimas. We had to set up a temporary building for more than 10 years because Anwar took the funds and chanelled it elsewhere. To me, I don’t trust a person like this.

 

Secondly there were a lot of projects which he promised to the people in Kuching but none of it has materialised.

 

Thirdly, outside Sarawak…on the international scene, he said he disagreed with having oil palm plantations along our coastal swampy areas. If the Malays in Sarawak were to find out that Anwar objected to this, they will be upset with him. This is due to the fact that the coastal populace enjoyed better living due to the existence of oil palm plantations in their area.

 

If Pakatan wins, together with their promises, this state will be bankrupt. The oil royalty promise is just a sweet promise that doesn’t come from the heart.

 

Q: Anwar is selling himself as the saviour of the country. Does he have the qualities to provide the leadership?

 

A: The greatest test for Anwar was during the 1997 financial crisis. We look at his reaction in following standard developing countries’ reaction when we had economic crisis. He called the International Monetary Fund, and the IMF will straight away say: “You pay your debts or the money go to New York or wherever.” If we were to do that, as some of the countries in the region did, we would have lost a lot of employments and our economy would have gone bust.

 

But as we know, we passed through 1997 without being hurt too much as opposed to some other countries. You ask why? The reason is very simple, the then Prime Minister said, “I don’t want Anwar’s solution. I don’t want IMF to come. I have a Malaysian solution.”

 

We didn’t want to impoverish our country. What we need to do was to manage our supply of money and our capital flow and that’s what Tun Dr Mahathir did. I think this approach is even endorsed by developed countries. Even in the European crisis today some of them think Tun Dr Mahathir was right.

 

Anwar never thought what would happen to Malaysia. He’s got good relationships with his friends outside (IMF, World Bank and the rest). His focus was to please them first and not what he can do for the country.

To me a person like this is not immersed in fighting for his own people.

 

When asked how do we remember Anwar in Sarawak for his tenure as Federal Minister, as Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister? We would reply, “do not ask anything on what he has left for us, I think what we have now will be gone too.” Just use the case of funds meant for Unimas as an example. As far as Sarawak is concerned, Anwar did not look after Sarawak. I hope he does not become the Prime Minister.

 

Q: What is the progress of Score (Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy) now, after almost five years?

 

 

A: Score started its operations only about two years. Almost 30 big companies have applied to build factories in Samalaju. Five factories have been built and the rest are at different stages including planning and so on.

 

Based on these applications, it is beyond my expectation. We thought of having only 1000ha of land for these purposes but it is not enough. I have to allocate 6000ha in Samalaju for this. Currently a port has been built and there is one operating factory in the area.

 

We will see a lot of positive developments and responses for the upcoming years. I was quite worried at first with the global financial crisis but so far everything moving well.

 

Q: Recently Malaysian Airlines bought a substantial number of aircrafts for Mas Wings service. It shows that demand for rural domestic flight is growing. Having said that, in 2015, Asean open-sky policy will come in. How will Sarawak government react or respond to this policy and new airlines like Malindo Air in the region?

 

A: Probably the open-sky policy will be a challenge. But liberalising airline policy has its good and bad, but in the end the airlines know how to survive.

 

In the case of Sarawak, we are looking for more entry from outsiders to Sarawak and it will give greater accessibility to the state. I don’t know what the new policy is…whether we will handle it or Mas will take over, it doesn’t matter to me. What is more important is we take advantage of getting linked with the outside world.

 

Q: When are you expected to finalise the list of candidates?

 

 

A: All of these things are in the PM’s hands. As far as PBB (Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu) is concerned, it’s okay… we have decided since last year. In SDPD (Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party) there’s a lot of movement so PM has got to decide. PRS (Parti Rakyat Sarawak), I think there’s only one problem. SUPP (Sarawak United People’s Party), the list of their candidates is about to be finalised.

 

Q: Any specific message to the people in Sarawak for the upcoming election?

 

 

A: The Opposition tries to sell the idea that there should be change. That they (Opposition) are able to take over the government. It’s a normal line. But the people of Sarawak have got to be convinced whether the change is for the better or not. As far as I’m concerned we cannot afford to have a Federal Government that is led by people who have less than proven ability.

 

To us, Datuk Pattinggi Najib (Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak) is the best candidate for PM at the moment. I don’t think we should look beyond that.

 

If we think he’s the best person to become the Prime Minister, as far as Sarawak is concerned, we’ve got to go give all the best votes for him. He has proved to be much more sympathetic to the problems of Sarawak.

In fact by giving Sarawak and Sabah RM 5 billion to catch up with the demand for rural roads, electricity and water supply, we have more or less covered all the areas in rural Sarawak.

 

Because of that I think the PM will get a great deal of support among the rural people of Sarawak. He’s very sympathetic to Baram which was an area that suffered some difficulties because of its infrastructure which led to migration of a lot of educated people to Miri.

 

I think it’s quite natural while we are taking steps to have long-term big development in Baram area, we have to do something within the next 20 years.

 

By having to develop Baram as one of the areas to produce electricity for Score, we have a big project that can allow us to plan for much bolder steps to change the character of development in Baram.

 

Today Baram is still dependent on timber and lately palm oil but there’s sufficient development in Baram area to support good employment opportunities. We have identified the area where the first dam will be sited and around the dam I see there’s enough development to support about 3,000 to 4,000 employment opportunities.

 

If we can build the township (in Baram), instead of tackling Baram’s resettlement problem we build a township like what we did for Bakun. It will be a healthy development.

 

While we can’t stop the migration of well-educated people completely from Baram like most rural areas, it will create opportunities for the educated people to come back. That to me is very important and that can only be done by having a development that is focused on the creation of the new town.

 

That’s why in Sarawak, the state government has decided to build a town near the dam. It’s an approach that’s been regarded as exciting by community leaders in Baram itself and they are welcoming it very much. I think this will be a good way to show that BN is always ahead to see what can be done to enhance the development potential of Sarawak itself. With the support of the Federal Government, this will bring about restructuring of basic problems in Sarawak, namely the distribution of the population.

 

I think the same approach is welcomed in Kapit because we also feel that border areas cannot afford to lose the population too much as we need a secure border for the future.

 

When we face this election we are going to see more forward thinking in the context of Sarawak because we have a good Prime Minister who can understand this kind of thing. I doubt whether someone in Pakatan Pembangkang will be able to produce that level of vision, expertise in economic and social development.

 

We know most of the leaders in Opposition, we cannot see anybody from them who can see this level of development for Sarawak even if we can get along with them. That’s the outlook that we have from the Sarawak perspective.

 

Q: What is your message to the people of Sarawak and the people of Malaysia in general? What are your plans for the state?

 

A: To the people of Sarawak, Sarawak is undergoing very aggressive economic policy. Score will require a lot of infrastructures. We need quite a lot of development that it will be heavier for Sarawak to shoulder alone. We need a Federal Government that understands our process of development.

 

I would say let’s elect experienced leaders. At least they have been brought up in the surrounding of development planning and execution as it has been imbued in our system.

 

It has been adopted by our various leaders and refined from time to time by our Prime Ministers. The best people are the people in Barisan Nasional to do this. I don’t think anybody from the Opposition has that kind of long-term views and practical experience. 

 

This concludes of interview with Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud, the Chief Minister of Sarawak.

Source: MOLE

Penang Govt' should listen to the rakyat on the undersea tunnel

Penang Govt’ should listen to the rakyat on the undersea tunnel

KUALA LUMPUR: The DAP-led Penang Government’s decision to pursue the costly RM6.3 billion highway project, particularly the construction of the undersea tunnel will only benefit a few stakeholders and not Penangites.

 

Universiti Sains Malaysia, Social Science Studies Faculty lecturer Prof Dr Ahmad Atory Hussain said,” “Even though the project is costly, it will contribute to a higher income for the state government. However, the people should know that the project will not benefit the ‘rakyat’ but it will benefit a few stakeholders.”

 

He explained that the state government is seen as putting aside people’s interest even though Penangites prefer to have a better public transportation system.

 

Ahmad Atory was commenting on the state’s government wish to construct an undersea tunnel to connect the Gurney Drive on the island with Bagan Ajam on the mainland.

 

“It is obvious that it is an unbalanced project where the leaders are only interested in gaining economic benefit without really considering what the people want and really need,” he said when contacted by The Mole recently.

 

The entire project comprises a 4.2km bypass from Gurney Drive to Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu, a 4.6km bypass between Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu and Bandar Baru Air Itam, a 12km paired road from Jalan Tanjung Bungah to Teluk Bahang and a 6.5km undersea tunnel between the island and Butterworth.

 

Recently, the Penang Consumer Association (CAP) had urged the Penang government to cancel its undersea tunnel project because it will bring losses in the long run to the people in the state.

 

CAP president S.M Mohamed Idris said the project was not the best solution to the traffic congestion on the island and that the state government should study numerous aspects especially on safety and the effects on the environment.

 

Penang-based blogger Anil Netto had published a full statement from Penang Forum Steering Committee where they opposed the tunnel project since it was concluded that the proposal had too many unanswered questions that “threw the viability of this mega project into doubt.”

 

While it is true that public transport comes under the jurisdiction of the federal government, we feel that ‘do-the-wrong-thing’ approach (promoting dependency on private motor vehicles over the long term) is worse than the ‘do-nothing’ approach,” the steering committee stated.

 

The blogger himself had claimed that by building more highways and a road-based tunnel, the state government will be facilitating the movement of more cars instead of encouraging people to use public transport.

 

Building highways and a road-based tunnel is at best an expensive short-term solution – funded by toll collection from the public and luxury property development. What happens when these get congested? We will be back to square one or even worse.

 

The state government seems to think that three highways and a tunnel (road-based rather than rail link) will take Penang into the 21st century. This is a fallacy. It will take Penang backwards to the 1970s, when highways were seen as symbols of progress,” the blogger wrote further.

 

Meanwhile, blogger Khoo Kay Peng, who is a strategy and management consultant as well as a political analyst, had written that the project is a symptom of DAP-Pakatan Rakyat inability to govern prudently.

 

It is difficult to understand why the state government is insisting on going ahead with these projects although a number of parties have voiced their reservation that this is not a long term solution to solve congestion problem in Penang.

 

There are a whopping 2.4 million cars in Penang. More than 110,000 new cars are being registered annually in Penang. The constructions of more highways are not going to contribute towards a gradual reduction of private cars and vehicles on the road,” he wrote further.

 

Penang Barisan Nasional (BN) youth deputy chief Shaik Hussein Mydin too had raised issue over the project and had demanded that the state government “come clean” about every company awarded with the project tenders.

 

We want to know who is building the roads, whether there is any political connection, their financial capacity and who are involved in these unheard-of companies.

We ask the chief minister to answer these questions. I do not understand why he wants to rush the tunnel project before the (next) general election,” he told a press conference recently.

Source: MOLE

Social club that says no to political "bullshit" angers Guan Eng

“I will not forgive you”. - Lim Guan Eng, belatedly, to Penang Club for refusing to allow him to launch Kee Thuan Chye’s Bullshit 2




Be afraid. Be very afraid. If the DAP retains Penang in the 13th General Election, the exco members of the Penang Club (est 1868) can expect retribution. Nobody takes liberties with the Chief Minister, says Lim Guan Eng, who happens to be the Chief Minister. The Penang Club did, Guan Eng said, for refusing to allow him to launch More Bullshit, an anti-BN sequel by former journalist Kee Thuan Chye.

Kee: Openly anti-BN
after March 2008
And although that incident happened a month ago [read here], the Chief Minister still could not get over it. He was so angry yesterday he started talking in third person:

“To err is human, to forgive divine. On a personal level, Lim Guan Eng can forgive you but as the chief minister, he will not forgive the Penang Club. You can take liberties with Lim Guan Eng because I am an ordinary citizen but when you take liberties with the post of the chief minister, I have the right to defend my office, because my office has the mandate of the people of Penang and I represent them,” Lim said, Malaysiakini reports.

If anyone says that Guan Eng didn’t sound vengeful or what he said wasn’t really a threat against the Penang Club, I’d say, DON’T BULLSHIT LAH!

"Give us an official reply," Pas tells DAP on Kedah water deal

“Give us an official reply,” Pas tells DAP on Kedah water deal

KUALA LUMPUR: Pas-led Kedah government has demanded Penang government to make it official if they do not wish to meet and discuss on the raw-water deal.

 

In a recent interview Kedah state Water Supply and Water Resources committee chairman Datuk Phahrolrazi Zawawi told The Mole: “They (Penang government) should give us official reply whether they want or refuse to have a meeting with us.”

 

“We are still waiting for their response. If they do not want to meet us, why can’t they officially inform us?” Phahrolrazi said when asked to comment on the snub from the Penang Government.

 

In an interview, Penang state executive Public Works, Utility and Transportation committee chairman Lim Hock Seng said there should be no further explanation on the matter.

 

He said the DAP-led state government will not be having a meeting with the Kedah Government to discuss the issue.

 

When asked whether the Kedah government will push for the raw water deal despite the snub from Penang, Phahrolrazi said: “Of course we will.”

 

“The water flows from our side. We are waiting for the right time to approach this matter and to take action to solve this issue once and for all.”

 

The Pas Kedah deputy commissioner also said that the matter will be resolved after the 13th general election.

 

“After the election, we will push for this deal to be resolved. In the mean time we do not want other people to use this deal as an issue to attack us,” Phahrolrazi explained.

 

He also said that the issue should be handled by any parties which forms the state government after the general election. 

 

When pointed out that any delay to resolve the deal will only cause losses especially to the people of Kedah, Phahrolrazi said: “We have our own way to deal with it.”

 

The Mole had previously reported Phahrolrazi as saying that he wanted the Penang Government to agree to pay up for Kedah raw water and expected this to be finalised in a meeting with Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng.

 

Phahrolrazi was also quoted as saying in a news report that Penang should make a decision as soon as possible since the Kedah government had already included a projected revenue of about RM20 million to the state coffers from the purchase.

 

A blog post at Tunku Aisha has stated the people in Kedah are beginning to question on the raw water deal, wondering whether the state government is really serious on the matter.

 

The post read:“Rakyat Kedah are beginning to ask what happened to the estimated RM20 million profit which was gained from selling their water supply to Penang which was announced by its Chief Minister as a smart measure to reduce the state’s budget deficit. Would it stay as a fairy tale for rakyat?” 

Source: MOLE

Kyplex Cloud Security Seal - Click for Verification