Election Commission

PSM says Pas supporters attacked its operation centre

KUALA  LUMPUR: Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)  says its Kota Damansara’s election operation centre was attacked by a trio of Pas supporters today.

 

In a telephone interview, its national treasurer A. Sivarajan told The Mole that the office was attacked by three individuals who he claims were from Pas.

 

When asked if he was sure the individuals were from Pas, Sivarajan said: “Yes, they are Pas members.”

 

Narrating the incident, Sivarajan said: “Around 2.20pm today, while I was in our bilik gerakan (operations centre) three guys dressed in Pas t-shirts started shouting at us alleging that we took down their party flags.”

 

“They were asking for our party chairman Dr Nasir’s (Dr Nasir Hashim) number and a few other numbers of our polling officers.”

 

“We told them to go and make a report to the Election Commission instead of coming to our office and making a big noise,” Sivarajan added.

 

According to Sivarajan the trio then started taking photographs of the place and left shortly in two cars and on one motorbike.

 

Sivarajan said he lodged a report about the incident at the Kota Damansara police station shortly after.

 

“After the report was made, the police came over to our centre and started their investigation.”

 

He also said that all the five PSM volunteers and himself who were present when the Pas supporters came were not harmed. 

 

“This is actually the second incident…on nomination day (April 20), after Pas has announced to field their candidate in Kota Damansara, we had received a lot of calls and text messages informing us that a group of people were intending to attack us.”

 

“Fortunately nothing happened,” he said.

 

Sivarajan has also questioned the motive behind the incident as Pas who has agreed to withdraw its candidate from the Kota Damansara state constituency to make way for PSM’s Dr Nasir to contest under the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) ticket.

 

He said, ”Pas secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali already said that it will not field its candidate Razali Ismail to contest here and things were all good between PSM and Pas.”

 

“Yet, the Pas candidate was seen campaigning here, in areas such as the Pekan Subang market and Bandar Pinggiran Subang.”

 

“This is against the decision of the Pas headquarters, ” he added.                                                                                                                                                                                                     Dr Nasir is facing a five-cornered fight against Barisan Nasional candidate Halimatun Saadiah Bohan and three independents Edrus Abdullah, Halmi Omar and A Suppiah.

 

In the last general election in 2008, Dr Nasir defeated Barisan Nasional candidate Zein Isma Ismail with a 1,075 majority.

 

There are 44,992 voters in Kota Damansara of which 56 percent are Malays, 29 percent Chinese and 13 per cent Indians.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nurul Izzah is denying our right to vote,says Lembah Pantai voter

Nurul Izzah is denying our right to vote,says Lembah Pantai voter

KUALA LUMPUR: A Lembah Pantai voter feels that incumbent Nurul Izzah Anwar’s decision to seek an appeal following the dismissal of her application to strike out ‘dubious’ voters in the constituency as a blatant attempt to deny their right to vote.

 

 

 

The voter, 61-year-old Mohd Yahya Yusoff said :  “I am not siding anyone on this issue but when Nurul Izzah brought our names up to be struck off in the judicial review, of course I feel the need to defend my rights.” 

 

Nurul Izzah had recently sought for an appeal following the High Court’s dismissal of her application to compel the Election Commission (EC) to strike out “dubious” voters in the Lembah Pantai electoral roll.

news report by The Sun stated: Meanwhile, in response to claims that Nurul Izzah was trying to remove genuine voters from the roll, her political secretary Fahmi Fadzil said the case was against the EC.

 

 

“You cannot claim that the judicial review is only meant for the Election Commission and the National Registration Department (NRD) when it is our voting right that’s at stake.” 

 

Commenting on the news report Yahya said: “If it’s against the EC, why is the list of names are only restricted for Lembah Pantai?”

 

“Our names were stated in the list. If the court rules that our names to be struck off, it is us who will be denied our voting rights.”

 

When asked how he managed to get the name list of alleged phantom voters, Yahya said: “It is from a PKR insider who is sympathetic about our predicament.”

 

“I used to be a PKR supporter too. Some of my neighbours in PKR told me about this case and passed me the list to act upon.”

 

He also strongly denied claims that his movement ‘Gempur’ is a mere political tool adding that Gempur is formed only to defend the right of alleged phantom voters in Lembah Pantai to vote not only in the upcoming polls but also the future General Election.

 

Prior to this Yahya and more than 50 registered voters in Lembah Pantai gathered to protest against Nurul Izzah who had alleged that they are phantom voters in the area.

 

Yahya and other residents took the initiative to explain that they are legitimate voters who have voted numerous times in the constituency.

 

In response to a question on why he did not update his voting details to the EC, Mohd Yahya said: “I am an old man who lives here for 44 years. For my friends and I, as long as our name and address tallies with the voting place, that’s good enough.”

 

He further said that if Nurul Izzah is sincere in ensuring that the electoral roll of residents in Lembah Pantai is updated, there should be an effort to have awareness campaigns for it in his area.

 

“We are old folks. Not many of us are internet-savvy. We may take it for granted that we can vote here without updating our details with EC but we need to be informed of it too.”

 

“After all the election is only once in five years,” he added.

 

Mohd Yahya did not deny that several names in the list were voters who had passed away, but he said it is the next-of-kin’s duty to update it with the EC.

 

On March 22 this year, Nurul Izzah through her lawyer Edmund Bon has filed a judicial review, demanding the Election Commission to nullify the registration of 4,637 or seven per cent out of 72,533 voters in Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat.

 

Judge Datuk Seri Zakaria Sam reportedly dismissed the leave application for a judicial review filed by Nurul Izzah for a declaration that the refusal by the chief registrar of election to strike out the voters’ names in the principal electoral roll of Lembah Pantai in 2011 and the supplementary electoral roll for the second quarter of 2012 was illegal and invalid.

 

Nurul Izzah will be involved in a three-cornered fight to defend her seat. She is being challenged by Barisan Nasional’s Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin and independent Rusli Baba.

 

In the 2008 general election Nurul Izzah won the seat defeating BN’s Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil with a majority of 2,895 votes. 

Source: MOLE

Cyberwar-Don't be the victim

Cyberwar-Don’t be the victim

KUALA LUMPUR: Gone were the days of mainstream media having the upper hand of being the only source of information dissemination.

 

Although Malaysia was initially sluggish in jumping on the new media bandwagon back in the 90s, the advent of technology propelled the public into cyberspace rather abruptly at the turn of the millennium.

 

At the height of Malaysia’s political upheaval in the late 90s, as a result of then deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sacking and subsequent indictment of sodomy, Malaysians began to turn to alternative sources for information.

This was something that caught the ruling government Barisan Nasional (BN) off guard.

Anwar, having gained notorious support particularly from the younger demographic at the time, unknowingly became a catalyst that drove Malaysians into a new age of information seeking and sharing.

 

Despite the fact that BN was somewhat unprepared for the sudden switch from ‘old media’ or above-the-line ‘promotion’ methods to the information superhighway, it has managed to catch up thus bringing the Government-Opposition ‘cyberwar’ to a level playing field.

While the term ‘cyberwar’ speaks for itself, the fundamental element of cyberwar is the abolishment of the ‘gatekeeper’. Suddenly, the public found a way to express themselves and reach out to a wider audience without any barriers.

The catch? New media brought along with it propagandas, controversies and the alleged other side of the coin. The public lapped it up and was hungry for more.

Bloggers came out of the woodwork and all of a sudden, people became more vocal from the comforts of their own home, hiding behind anonymous names and images.

The more responsible and vocal bloggers includes the likes of former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. He first started using new media after the 2008 general election, particularly to hit out at the administration of then Prime Minister and his successor, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Several bloggers including pro-BN blogger Rockybru and Umno member blogger Big Dog, hopped on board.

In some ways, BN was not at all ready for the impact new media had back in 2008. The price was paid when BN lost five states – Kedah, Kelantan, Perak, Penang and Selangor – to the Opposition coalition.

However, the Opposition did not achieve this unprecedented victory solely on their own accord. Dr Mahathir and pro-BN bloggers who were critical of Pak Lah’s administration in their writings pretty much gave the Opposition an upper hand.

A general overview of the cyberwar in 2008 is that the criticism exercised by bloggers at the time was more constructive and based on truth. But with more people entering the blogosphere, it has since evolved to become a venomous ground of ‘anything goes’.

With more outlets for people to voice their opinions, comes the responsibility of readers to vet what is the truth and what is mere nonsense.

With that said, 2008 still served as an eye-opener for BN who then went on a mission to conquer new media. 

According to a social media survey website, Socialbakers.com, Prime Minister and BN chairman Datuk Seri Najib Razak has the highest number of followers on Twitter and Facebook, for a political figure. He outranks local celebrities on Twitter as well.

The Opposition’s impact, if judged solely on the number of followers its leaders have garnered, is not as strong as BN.

 

While the number of Twitter followers and Facebook likes do not necessarily reflect public sentiment, it is clear that BN has managed to catch up on the time lost. As the leaders take to social networks, supporters are also following closely behind and here is where the cyberwar becomes a no holds barred battleground.

The danger of new media is in its fundamental element; that there are no gatekeepers. Without any filter, it becomes easy for anyone to propagate lies as the truth, fiction for fact, and half-truths become whole.

Last Sept 28, Malaysian Digest reported on a 1Malaysia school exercise book with a sketched picture of Najib’s face on it, in which PKR Rembau division chief Badrul Hisham Shahrin or Chegubard had claimed that it was a desperate attempt by Najib and BN to win support.

He had alleged in PKR’s party organ KeadilanDaily.com that the exercise book was to be distributed and used in schools by the government.

However, subsequent checks by MD revealed that the books were part of an art project by Gerai 1Malaysia, an initiative that had nothing to do with BN but more of a parody project in promoting the 1Malaysia brand.

All it took was a simple phone call. Like any other ethical media organization, MD’s strict vetting policy when it comes to reporting is borne out of a sense of responsibility to supply the public with only truth.

Following the clarification on the matter, the KeadilanDaily.com article was taken down with Chegubard posting an official apology on his blog.

While many become more tech and Internet savvy, there are those who got lazier. They feed on propaganda and controversies without wanting to find out the truth behind certain allegations.

Last Monday, MD was alerted of a current Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) bill being circulated highlighting the Renewable Energy Fund charges. Some blogs accused the charges as a way of BN to take money from the public.

Again, a quick check online and a call to TNB revealed that the charges have been sanctioned since 2011, was widely reported in the media, and is only applicable to those who use more than 300kwh of electricity in a month.

Another example would be DAP recently crying foul with regards to the Election Commission (EC) allegedly not allowing them to use their rocket symbol for the upcoming GE.

Rockybru later revealed the other side of the story in his blog posting here.

Damage would have been done, especially amongst those who do not bother to check.

By now, readers, especially those who frequent cyberspace more than mainstream media, would be able to discern which sites are pro-Opposition and which are pro-Government. The best course of action in the cases of dubious stories, is to read what both sides have to say, and make an informed deduction.

We need to realize that as the world becomes more and more borderless, information-wise, verification and common sense are highly important.

While some of us are now more skeptical towards mainstream media, saying that they are nothing more than government tools and that their content is filtered and do not convey the whole truth, the same goes for new media. Not everything we read on the Internet is true.

Cyberspace is rife with conspiracy theorists, hungry for an audience. This is something we need to constantly remind ourselves of.

Being a blogger and a blog-reader at the same time, this writer has often been faced with crossroads. The most common one being, “If I want more people to read this, all I need to do is sensationalize the truth a tad, and voila!”

However, one thing keeps this writer in check – that the world needs to be a better place. Lies and sensationalism would only contribute to a rumor-mongering society who shuns facts and consumes propaganda.

The end result of that is an ugly picture. A world where facts, figures and logic get thrown out the window in favor of gossips.

The same goes for campaigning during elections. The fight has now been taken online and supporters of each party are battling it out with blogs, Photoshopped pictures, videos and social networking.

Last week, MD carried a pictorial on the GE13 cyberwar. Both sides unleashed their creativity at editing photos but to what end? Where does creativity end and slander kick in?

This is a sensitive time in Malaysian history. The upcoming general election is set to be a colorful and ground-breaking one. Whether the ruling government regains its two-third majority or the Opposition sweeps in with a big win, the rules, like it or not, are changing. Both sides must be aware of the new responsibility that comes with the free-for-all world of cyberspace.

It may appear as an easier platform to reach out to voters, but there must also be an understanding that rational and logic should still outrule emotional factors.

While it is highly important to embrace new media, we must also be grounded in the practice of counter-checking facts.

Carson Daly had this to say about media giant NBC, “The plate tectonics of media have shifted where NBC had to become a new media company from an old media company.”

It is apparent that the shift is inevitable but it is also imperative that we remind ourselves how we need to be our own gatekeepers.

As for MD, we will continue to exercise our strict policy in verifying our stories before we report on them. Like many other newsportals, we prioritize fact-checking and will continue to do so in our bid to neutralize the playing field that is cluttered with half-truths and lies. - By Farah Harith

 

 

 

 

Source: MOLE

List of GE13 foreign observers to be finalised this week

List of GE13 foreign observers to be finalised this week

JOHOR BAHARU — The list of foreign observers for the 13th general election on May 5 is expected to be finalised within this week, according to the Election Commission (EC) deputy chairman, Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar.

He said the countries invited to observe Malaysia’s general election process were Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Thailand and the Philippines, as well as representatives from the Asean Secretariat.

“These countries and the secretariat will be sending seven representatives each, with three of them to be given the status of official guests of Malaysia,” he said after visiting the polling centres in the Gelang Patah parliamentary constituency today.

Wan Ahmad said there were countries that requested to send 40 observers each but the EC had set the number at seven.

He also reminded all quarters not to wear any piece of clothing and headgear with their party logo or symbol on polling day.

“However, the 1Malaysia can be used as it is not political in nature but the tagline of the ruling BN government’s administration,” he said.-BERNAMA-

Source: MOLE

Sacrificing for Pakatan, PKR T'ganu withdraws candidates

Sacrificing for Pakatan, PKR T’ganu withdraws candidates

KUALA LUMPUR: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Terengganu chief Azan Ismail said the decision to withdraw three of its candidates who are vying for state seats in the May 5 elections is a sacrifice for Pakatan Rakyat.


Despite having filed their nomination papers on April 20, Azan when contacted by The Mole on Monday said: “You must get the concept clear. We are not giving away our seats to Pas.”

 

“We are withdrawing ourselves for the sake of Pakatan Rakyat.”

 

When asked why PKR nominated their candidates in Kota Putera, Seberang Takir and Bukit Besi in the first place, Azan said: “Actually those seats are indeed allocated for PKR.”

 

“But for the sake of our relationship with Pas and to avoid greater loss for Pakatan, we make this sacrifice.”

 

In a press conference Azan reportedly announced that PKR has decided to withdraw its candidates for the three seats and urged PKR supporters to vote for Pas instead.

 

Those three state seats will see a three-cornered fight between Pas, PKR and Barisan Nasional.

 

Apart from the seats in Terengganu, Pas will have a face off with PKR in Labuan parliamentary seat, Sg Acheh, Panti, and Kota Damansara state seats.

 

Meanwhile Pas president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang reportedly said that Pas will withdraw its candidates from Labuan parliamentary seat, Sg Aceh and Panti state seats.

 

In a news report Abdul Hadi said Pas is contesting against its Pakatan partner PKR in seven seats to “save” the coalition.

 

The Star reported Hadi as claiming that Pas discovered some of the candidates fielded by PKR had moral issues while some “subscribed to Marxism.”

 

The Mole had also reported that Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) chairman Dr Nasir Hashim who said that the party should not be blamed for the tussle for seats with Pas. 

 

“He (Hadi) should know the difference between socialism and communism and why PSM exists in Malaysia,” Dr Nasir said.

 

His fellow colleague in PSM, Dr M. Jeyakumar reportedly criticised Abdul Hadi for his remarks labelling Karl Marx as the devil was a wild accusation without understanding the principle and struggle of of socialism.


Dr Nasir who is defending the Kota Damansara seat under the PKR banner will face Ridzuan Ismail from Pas, Halimaton Saadiah Bohan from Barisan Nasional (BN) and three independents – Edroos Abdullah, A. Suppiah and Halmi Omar.

 

Election Commission (EC) deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar reportedly said candidates who announced to withdraw themselves after nomination day will still be contested and their names will be printed on the ballot paper.

Source: MOLE

Twist and shout, and the DAP spinned the ROS

Twist and shout, and the DAP spinned the ROS

KUALA LUMPUR: Journalist and blogger Datuk Ahirudin Attan – also known as Rocky – said a letter from the Registrar of Societies (ROS) regarding irregularities in the Democratic Action Party’s (DAP) Central Executive Committee (CEC) elections was professional and to-the-point but was spun and twisted by the DAP’s leadership. 

 

The letter, which was dated 17 April 2013 and signed by Dato’ Abdul Rahman Othman, Chairman of the Election Commission and Director-General of the ROS, said that the ROS had been made aware of a controversy whereby some DAP members were not satisfied with the outcome of the party’s CEC elections last December. 

 

The letter said “the validity of the Democratic Action Party’s Central Executive Committee which was chosen on 15 December 2012 is doubted”

 

The letter further stated that non-compliance with the requests made by the ROS could lead to deregistration of the party. 

 

Rocky said the letter was “to-the-point, professional” but was nonetheless given a different spin by the DAP and its leaders. 

 

“Yet it was not just spun, its content was twisted, turned and teared as the Lims cried, cried wolf and cried foul in the hope that the people would forget that it was them – not ROS or anyone else – who mucked up their own little in-house election back in December 2012 and it was their own comrades who lodged a complaint about procedural discrepancies that resulted in 753 party members denied their rights to vote,” Rocky wrote in a post about ‘the letter Guan Eng didn’t want you to read’. 

 

“Even so-called non-partisan observers like Bridget Welsh fell for it when she declared ‘This tactic is perhaps the most blatant. Do they assume that people do not respect fair play? Do they think that Malaysians are willing to accept a process that is unfair’? Did she forget the right of the 753 DAP members to fair play and a process that is ‘bersih’?” Rocky asked. 

 

He added: 

 

“Now, where in the ROS letter did you say the DAP would not be allowed to use its party logo for Nominations Day or/and General Elections?” 

 

Rocky was referring to a decision by DAP leadership to have its candidates contest under the banners of its Pakatan Rakyat partners, PAS and PKR in the wake of the letter from the ROS. 

 

Blogger Dave Avran highlighted a second letter to the DAP from the ROS, dated 19 April 2013, which stated that the party would not be hindered from using its own symbols during GE13. 

 

Avran pointed out that the controversy was caused by the DAP, not by the ROS, and that the latter had taken action because of complaints by members of the party and had “acted based on their standard operating procedure by asking DAP to submit its report on the matter”

 

The blogger further wrote: 

 

“There is no issue about DAP not being able to use its rocket symbol as the party is still a valid political party and its symbol is still registered with Election Commission. There is absolutely no issue about whether party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng can issue candidacy letters to the EC as he also served as secretary-general under the previous CEC.

 

“However, all the above facts have been conveniently spun by DAP to give the perception that the ROS had intentionally wanted to deregister the party.

 

“In typical DAPster spin, they used words such as ‘despicable’, ‘BN sabotage’, ‘worse than repressive Singapore’, ‘how can we trust their word’ (referring to the Election Commission) as well as questioning the timing of the letter.

 

“They also put up a drama by projecting themselves as being victimised and therefore having no choice but to use PAS or PKR symbols when in fact there is really no issue about using the rocket symbol.”

Source: MOLE

EC: No withdrawals allowed – names will be on ballots

Candidates whose nominations have been finalised can no longer withdraw from contesting in the 13th general election.

Election Commission (EC) deputy chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said that a provision in law to allow for such withdrawals has been abolished.

“We no longer have that provision under Election Regulations 1981. Anyone who has been nominated, they will appear on the ballot papers and people will be allowed to vote for them,” he said during a press conference in Putrajaya today.

He said however that candidates are allowed to make declarations of withdrawal, as that is their “personal choice”, but there will be no changes in the ballot papers.

“These are all internal party matters. As far as the law goes, this is final,” he said.

Wan Ahmad’s statement means that PKR and PAS will still face each other in seven state seats across the country, with the only option being for either party to urge the public to support the other party.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=76794







Posted by
on Apr 22 2013. Filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

EC: No withdrawals allowed – names will be on ballots

Candidates whose nominations have been finalised can no longer withdraw from contesting in the 13th general election.

Election Commission (EC) deputy chairperson Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said that a provision in law to allow for such withdrawals has been abolished.

“We no longer have that provision under Election Regulations 1981. Anyone who has been nominated, they will appear on the ballot papers and people will be allowed to vote for them,” he said during a press conference in Putrajaya today.

He said however that candidates are allowed to make declarations of withdrawal, as that is their “personal choice”, but there will be no changes in the ballot papers.

“These are all internal party matters. As far as the law goes, this is final,” he said.

Wan Ahmad’s statement means that PKR and PAS will still face each other in seven state seats across the country, with the only option being for either party to urge the public to support the other party.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=76794







Posted by
on Apr 22 2013. Filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

The "Rocket" that never meant to land on the "Moon" in the first place

Kudos to the Registrar of Societies who stood firm and called the DAP’s bluff despite the tears and the threat from the  Opposition public. As Frankie says, “there was never a threat to deregister the party”. If the Lims thought they had come up with a great plan to cover the big hole of their party elections in December, they may have dug the hole even deeper now …

Brilliance of DAP?
Sunday, April 21, 2013 – 19:23
by Frankie D’Cruz

THE stunning scheme by the DAP to use the logo of another party was a deliberate ploy to draw public sympathy, say party insiders.They said the unprecedented strategy brought to fore the moral and ethical shortfalls of the party leadership and exposed a “brilliant” plan that was hatched for a sterling performance at the stumps.Ground readings by The Malay Mail showed that while the DAP may have achieved that to a degree, the misstep by the party has also triggered outrage among party members and supporters.Despite going to the polls with its ‘rocket’, members of the largely Chinese DAP felt that the party’s intention to use PAS’ moon logowas an indication that both parties now accept each other’s ideologies.They said it was tactically a great move, as it could condition non-Muslim voters to view PAS favourably as well as dispel lingering notions among Muslims that the DAP was against PAS philosophy.The Chinese held that using the PAS logo was demeaning to the community. Muslims, on the other hand, berated the PAS leadership for the symbol accord and warned them not to sacrifice its principles.One party insider said the Registrar of Societies (RoS) did not bow to public pressure in allowing DAP candidates to use their own party symbol because “there never was a threat to deregister the party”.He said the RoS was procedurally right in not recognising DAP’s newlyelected central executive committee (CEC) after its party election results were called into question.“The party leadership failed to heed calls by the RoS to hold fresh elections and gave them ample time to do so. They insisted that the amended results were correct and acceptable. 

Why rocket never landed on the moon 

“However, the latest letter by the RoS to the party dated April 17 was ill-timed and caused widespread confusion that to my assessment resulted in a substantial number of fence sitters swinging towards the DAP,” he said.The letter stated that the RoS was doubtful of the validity of the CEC’s status on grounds that the complaints from 753 DAP members that they were disallowed from contesting the party elections last Dec. 15.It noted the technical glitch in the poll results was also a source of discontent among members. A revision of the results three weeks after the convention saw Vincent Wu drop to the 26th spot from the original sixth position, while Zairil Abdullah, originally 39th climbed up to 20th spot and earned a seat in the CEC.Another insider said the RoS had set April 18 for an inquiry, but the party asked for a postponement and set May 17 as the new date.“In the so-called party symbol crisis, the RoS was merely stating the obvious that it could not recognise the new CEC. It has neither declared the elections or the CEC null and void. Any decision about the legality of the elections would only come after a full inquiry.“The latest letter was just a reminder that the party must provide explanations to the satisfaction of the registrar, failing which the RoS can deregister the party.“Such reminders are common as many societies have similarly received such notices in the past,” he said.He said: “Even if the new CEC is not recognised by RoS, the party still can function as the previous committee can assume their duties until a decision on the new committee is made. This principle is similar to the caretaker function in any association and government.“So, there is no issue about the DAP not being able to use its rocket symbol as it is still a valid political party and its logo is still registered with Election Commission.“There is no issue about whether party the secretary-general (Lim Guan Eng) could issued letters of authorisation to party candidates as he also served as secretary-general in the previous CEC.”He said the facts had been brilliantly distorted by the DAP leadership to paint a picture that the RoS intentionally wanted to de-register the party with alleged Barisan Nasional prodding.The script that followed, he said, was “ingenious”. “To condition the mind of the people, they deliberately used words such as “despicable”, “BN sabotage”, “worse than repressive Singapore”, “how can we trust their word (referring to the Election Commission) as well as questioned the timing of such letter from the RoS.

Nurul Izzah

Nurul Izzah – they are not phantoms, they are voters

KUALA LUMPUR: More than 50 registered voters in Lembah Pantai gathered this morning to protest against incumbent MP Nurul Izzah Anwar who had alleged they are phantom voters in the area.

Describing Nurul Izzah’s allegation as an attempt to deny the rights of 4,637 voters to vote in the upcoming polls, the voters’ representative Mohd Yahya Yusoff said: “We have been living here for many years and many of us have voted numerous times here.”

“In fact there are many of us who have voted in the area even way before she (Nurul Izzah) was born.”

Yahya, 61, said most of them were registered under their old addresses at the squatters’ area before being relocated to the government’s housing flats.

“Even when we have been relocated at a new place, we are still residents of Lembah Pantai,” he explained.

“Her attempt to nullify our voting registration shows her lack of knowledge about the history of Lembah Pantai. Just because one of the areas no longer exist due to development, it does not mean the addresses are fake and that we are phantom voters.”

Yahya listed several areas which were labelled as “phantom voters” hotspots as alleged by Nurul Izzah.

 

The areas include Kg Pasir Kiri, which is now Taman Gasing Hawker Centre, Kg Lembah Pantai, and squatters’ area in Bukit A,B,C and Kg Kerinchi.

“There are residents who voted for her in the last election and felt betrayed with her allegation. Most of us were shocked upon finding out that our names are in the list of so-called phantom voters,” he said.

Yahya said the residents have formed a movement called Gempur, to trace all of 4,637 voters to dispute Nurul Izzah’s allegations.

Another resident Ahmad Yaacob (pix), 73 told The Mole: “I have been voting since the 1964 general election.”

“I have lived in Putra Ria since 1970. There is no problem in voting whatsoever, why must she (Nurul Izzah) create an issue about it?”

Tong Gaik Hooi, 56, a resident in Taman Seri Sentosa said he is not afraid to show his proof that he is a legitimate voter on polling day on May 5th.

“I don’t know if it is a political tactic by her to go against BN, but I will just do my duty as a citizen.”

On March 22 this year, Nurul Izzah through her lawyer Edmund Bon has filed a judicial review, demanding the Election Commission to nullify the registration of 4,637 or seven per cent out of 72,533 voters in Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat.

 

However she  failed to get a High Court order to compel the Election Commission (EC) to strike out dubious voter names in the electoral roll for her constituency.

 

Judge Datuk Seri Zakaria Sam reportedly dismissed the leave application for a judicial review filed by Nurul Izzah for a declaration that the refusal by the chief registrar of election to strike out the voters’ names in the principal electoral roll of Lembah Pantai in 2011 and the supplementary electoral roll for the second quarter of 2012 was illegal and invalid.

 

Nurul Izzah will be involved in a three-cornered fight to defend her seat. She is being challenged by Barisan Nasional’s Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin and independent Rusli Baba.

 

In the 2008 general election Nurul Izzah won the seat defeating BN’s Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil by a majority of 2,895. 

 

 

Source: MOLE

Kyplex Cloud Security Seal - Click for Verification