Leader

Not a nation obsessed with porn, we want the truth

Not a nation obsessed with porn, we want the truth

In an email to the Editor, Aidil Yunus wrote:

 

“Remember the days following the premier of (Datuk Seri) Chua Soi Lek’s video taken in a Batu Pahat hotel?

 

CSL admitted that he is the man in the video and thereafter resigned from his ministerial post.

 

There was never a moment CSL misled the public that it was manufactured by his opponents. He was not caught in the act with a ‘person for hire’.  

 

One of the favourite attacks by Pakatan Rakyat supporters especially those supporting DAP which is going after his blood is that he is a leader with such a low moral and an adulterer thus earning him a top place in the perpetual  race of league of ‘low class’ politicians.

 

By default then, for Pakatan Rakyat, if you are branded as a ‘low moral’ individual, you are not fit to be a leader.
 

If ‘good moral’ equates ‘main criteria to be a leader’, many of us have a right to wonder why Pakatan Rakyat is touting one man with a video or two showing him in a ‘very low moral act’ being endorsed as a their PM in waiting?

 

These endorsements come from so called ‘pious’ Muslims like the PAS top rank to the ‘I Am Classier Than You’ DAP.
 

Yes, their answer is simple; like what a top leader of DAP publicly stated that ‘itu video fitnah, bukan betul, UMNO buat’ (the video is a slander, it is not real, UMNO did it) to ‘video adalah besi’ (am not sure how to translate this one).  

 

Are you satisfied with that answer? Than for PR, that answer is deemed a good to go to endorse Anwar Ibrahim as PM in waiting.  If you question their rationale, they will say ‘oh look at these BN supporters, they are obsessed with porn’.
 

Now have you guys ever heard of American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accrediting Board (ASCLD/LAB)?

 

If you have watched CSI, you must now be quite aware of Audio/Video forensic. ASCLD/LAB is one of the most well recognized regulatory bodies of sort for forensic expert. Audio/Video forensic is one of the thing they cover.

 

If I am Pakatan Rakyat and I want to eliminate the suspicion once and for all and would like to deliver a deadly blow to BN knowing I am right, I would have chosen to hire a forensic expert or two accredited by ASCLD/LAB to solidly debunk the myth of the videos.

 

If following the logic that caught in video = low moral and low moral = unfit leader, than don’t you think Anwar Ibrahim and the gang owe it to us to clear his name?  Take note that they never do this so far.

 

ASCLD/LAB is not the only accredited forensic expert but in US there are more than 35 universities offering audio/video forensic degree course.

 

I do think these videos will be a very good thesis for the final year students. Anwar don’t have to go far. In Asia there are more than 12 forensic labs with expertise to prove that he is not a ‘low class adulterer politician’ like what the DAP supporters like to call Chua Soi Lek.”

Source: MOLE

Guan Eng receives threatening call over son

PENANG Caretaker Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has reportedly received a sinister threat involving his young son from an unidentified caller.

His political secretary Ng Wei Aik said around 1pm yesterday, the DAP headquarters received a call from an English-speaking person who warned that Lim should “take care of his son”.

NONE“It looks like they want to play dirty tactics already. So, we have lodged a police report against the person,” said Ng, who is Tanjung candidate.

Ng said that the DAP has also received information that the Internet servers of their party websites, including its Facebook, are slowing down and affecting traffic to the sites.

“We checked and this does not happen in Singapore. It looks like  they are trying to block us from accessing the Internet,” he said.

He urged the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to play their “professional role” and take action on attempts to block the Internet sites of opposition parties.

“At the same time, please don’t just rely on the Internet, come to our ceramahs, especially the one to be held at Han Chiang College field, where DAP senior leader Kit Siang will be present,” he added.

‘More 1M’sia flags than voters’

Meanwhile, DAP state chief Chow Kon Yeow alleged that after eight days of campaigning, he noticed increasing incidences of “force, threats and money being used to get voters”.

“Such tactics are being done blatantly and openly, bringing our country backwards, while we are struggling to be a more democratic system.

bn flag with 1malaysia logo 250413 01“By using such tactics, BN is putting our people back to the olden days where money can help you achieve anything,” he said.

“We want people to prove that money is not everything, but what is more important is the pride and dignity of our children, which money can’t buy,” he added.

Chow said that Pakatan is unable to splash money around like its opponents but would rather promote its track record and future vision.

“We were naïve to expect BN to play a fair game. People are saying that there are more 1Malaysia flags than there are voters, and there is no place to hang them anymore,” quipped the Padang Kota candidate.

BN’s femme fatale: The power of women

GE13 SPECIAL Apart from civil servants, another decisive group in GE13 are women. They comprise 51.7 percent of the electorate and regularly turn out in high numbers, especially in semi and rural areas.

In close races, how women vote can make the difference. Numerically, women are largely in the urban areas, but disproportionately they are more influential politically in the more rural areas, as men are often outstation for employment.

Let’s take a look at how women can shape and have shaped the election so far, recognising that they will make an important impact this election and the trends are moving against the BN.

Traditionally, women disproportionately support the incumbent government more than men in the range of 5-8%.

NONEThe BN gender advantage varies by ethnicity; it is more pronounced among Malays, Indians and East Malaysians, although almost non-existent among Chinese. The gap also varies by class, as it is most pronounced among women in the lower classes.

The reasons for this gender gap are multiple, but four factors stand out. First, traditionally the Umno campaign has had the strongest women’s branch, Wanita Umno, and this group has played a major role in winning support. It has been the female face for the BN.

It is important to note that Umno historically was the first to include women actively in politics.

Second, women have less access to alternative forms of information outside of the mainstream media, as they often have less time to surf the Internet due to family responsibilities and do not attend ceramah at night in as high a number as men due also to the same family responsibilities.

Third, women, particularly those in the lower classes, are more responsive to the incentives of money. On the front line of managing the household economy, women find the extra funds useful for families and at the same time feel more obliged to repay the support.

NONEFinally, women are also seen to be more responsive to the fear tactics adopted by BN, and worry about the impact on their families. From information to fear, women generally appear more risk-adverse and this favours the incumbent government.

Yet, over the past few elections, this gender gap has been narrowing. The trend has been toward more women supporting the opposition. In fact in the urban areas among the Chinese, women are more likely to support Pakatan than BN.

Polling has also found a sharp increase of ordinary women engaged in politics in Malaysia from 2003 onwards, as seen by the composition of the rallies, protests such as Bersih and anti-Lynas and a female expansion of civil society at the local level.

From the broad trends, the gender gap this election will likely narrow further. Trends suggest more women in Malaysia are awakening politically, and clamouring in favour of change.

More attuned to local issues

One of the reasons for this movement in the voting pattern of women has to do with the salience of different issues in the GE13 campaign, as well as the outreach efforts by both camps.

Among women themselves, different groups, such as single versus married, have different sets of concerns. Yet, there are a few broad commonalities across women.

While men and women alike tend to prioritise concerns over cost of living, women disproportionately highlight greater concerns with issues tied to the family, such as education, weigh social problems such as drug addiction more heavily, and especially in the urban areas are deeply concerned with rising crime.

The tragic murder of Irene Ong Ai Sam in Bukit Gasing has brought to the fore the legitimate concerns regarding safety, and had a special impact for women who identify strongly with the mother-daughter bond.

One in four Malaysians are reported in surveys that either themselves or a family member have been a victim of crime, and disproportionately many of these crimes, such as robbery, affect women.

Studies show that women are more attuned to local issues than national ones. It is thus not surprising that many of the Himpunan Hijau environment group protestors were female.

The test in this election will be whether women think nationally and make the connection between their children’s future and the national results.

The BN’s strategy has been to keep the campaign with women local, using largely financial incentives and, in the past few days of the campaign, racial insecurity and fear.

NONEPakatan’s strategy toward women has been less clear, as outreach toward women has been uneven, but largely incorporated into the ‘change’ umbrella.

The two sides point to different sections in their manifestos, with the BN broadly promising gains in micro-finance and empowerment, while simultaneously touting its school vouchers and single mother packages.

In this latter group, the BN has been especially effective as the financial incentives have made an impact for this vulnerable community, especially among Indians and in East Malaysia.

Pakatan has developed a Women’s Initiative, which is geared largely toward married women, but offers the innovative idea of a retirement and emergency fund for housewives, training opportunities for all women and greater voice in government.

It is clear that both sides recognise the voting power of women, and have extended programmes, despite the limited public attention and knowledge of these initiatives.

Deteriorating BN record

Ordinary voters are not fully swayed by the promises, however. They are often actually influenced more by what happens in the campaign itself or the record in government.

BN is resting on its money-and-fear formula, while Pakatan is appealing to principles of cleaner government and fairness. The record of Najib Razak’s administration on women is coming into question, as he has served as women’s minister.

NONEThe women’s minister who was in cabinet, Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, was dropped for the National Feedlot Centre corruption scandal.

That the caretaker premier felt he was best suited to be women’s minister or could not find a suitable replacement in his coalition has already cast a cloud on the sincerity of attention to women’s issues.

It was blighted further by the faux pas in October 2012 when Najib claimed that Malaysia did not need women’s organisation as women were already empowered.

While significant gains have been made historically, Malaysia’s ranking is low globally at 120. There are persistent obstacles women face, from the difficulties of single mothers and higher levels of female poverty to political inclusion.

One area that is especially acute is protection on issues of family law. The share of Malaysian women in parliament, 9.9%, is lower than the global average of 18%.

The number of women’s ministers (1) and deputy ministers (6) in the BN has dropped as a share of the overall cabinet since Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took office, as fewer women, especially elected women, have been given decision-making power.

The perception of the most powerful women in the Najib government is his wife, Rosmah Mansor, who has not stood for election.

There is no clear success that Najib can point to in his four years in office for women. In fact, there are worrying trends.

Consider the issue of political representation further. The decline of women at the top of the BN corresponds to less influence in all of the main coalition parties, except Gerakan.

In Umno, MCA and MIC women leaders have been either marginalised or, in the case of Umno, scandalised.

MCA dropped its most prominent woman, Ng Yen Yen, while the MIC did not field any women for parliament. Tian Lian Hoe of Gerakan has emerged as one of the strongest and more reputable BN women leaders, but she is still not a minister.

Umno’s dropping of the deputy Wanita Umno leader is now well-known, but the persistent low of fielding women as candidates is not.

As the table below shows, the share of women fielded for parliament and state for Umno has remained stagnant since the 1999 election. Umno was in the vanguard for women’s political representation in Malaysia. It is now on par with PAS for fielding women.

Wanita Umno as an organisation has been facing serious decline, and its ability to even influence its own members to field women has waned. Many in Wanita Umno feel slighted.

WIDTH 435 pixels

The BN has not significantly increased its representation of women, especially at the national level. MCA has dropped the number of women fielded from seven to four, while no women from MIC will be contesting for parliament.

The opposition in contrast has increased its fielding of women, especially PAS. PKR top the number of women fielded for the opposition, but PAS has the biggest increase over the past elections.

This is a long way from their position in 1999, and speaks to a quiet revolution of women’s empowerment in the party.

Nevertheless, the Islamic party is still among the lowest in fielding women. The majority of seats fielding women are at the state level, and there is a shift in the numbers of women from the national level to the state level for women in parties like the DAP.

For the first time in history, the BN collectively with East Malaysia is now tied with the opposition in fielding 77 women each. Clearly, the BN has lost the advantage in fielding women.

New trends in fielding women

Given the gains over time the baton of political empowerment of women is moving from the BN to the opposition.

What is striking about the women’s candidates is the increasing diversity in backgrounds and impressive credentials of those fielded.

In PAS, we find singers such as Wan Aishah Wan Ariffin in Jempol, along with doctors and lawyers such as Mumtaz Md Nawi in Kelantan.

NONEIn the DAP, there are pharmacists such as Alice Lau (right) in Lanang. In Pakatan, the professional backgrounds has risen compared to the past.

Some of the women have served in politics, such as Kasthuriraani Patto in Batu Kawan, one of the few Indian women fielded nationally.

The woman candidates like orator Siti Aisha Shaik Ismail in Tambun and master’s degree holder Aiman Athirah Al-Jundi in Jelebu are young and dynamic, bringing new ideas and energy to the campaign.

The BN’s women candidates have not raised the same excitement, with concern with the fielding of Jessie Ooi fielded in Kuala Kubu Baru for the MCA, for example, whose infamy was a incoherent political tirade.

Yet, there are many bright women contesting, such as Mary Yap in Tawau, a teacher who has strong local roots, and Halimah Mohd Sadique of Johor.

What is important to note is that the women candidates in the BN have not received the same attention. In fact, what has drawn attention has been negative, such as the alleged actions of Hamidah Osman of Perak Umno who was blacklisted by Bersih.

This election does see, however, more women fielded than ever before, reflecting a national trend of growing female empowerment, but these numbers are far below global averages and targets within the parties themselves.

One factor that may have contributed to this is the dirtiness of this campaign, discouraging women from contesting.

Attacks on women can backfire

The women in this campaign, however, face fierce fights. An estimated 80% of women fielded in this campaign are in difficult races at the parliamentary level.

Some of these such as Pengerang, Jelebu and Tambun are real uphill battles. The same trend is replicated at the state level. In some cases, such as Ampang women are campaigning against each other, diminishing the chances of women to get into office.

The incumbent women, especially those that pose threats to the legitimacy of BN and have been strong performers, have been targeted.

NONENo where is this clearer in the campaign, however, than in the contest of Raja Nong Chik Zainal Abidin against Nurul Izzah Anwar (right).

Here the unelected federal minister has been using public money to win himself a seat, as he has taken personal credit for projects under this ministry, while simultaneously pouring in his personal funds gained in the lucrative construction sector.

For years now, Nurul Izzah has been targeted to be ‘brought down’. Parallel examples can be found in Teo Nie Ching now in Kulai and Dr Siti Mariah Mahmud of PAS who has to work hard to win Kota Raja, although these candidates have more promising chances.

What has become part of the political targeting has been the use of personal attacks against women. This happens on both sides, with Rosmah Mansor receiving arguably the most attacks.

She is portrayed as corrupt and controlling her husband, with these criticisms perhaps the sharpest within Umno itself.

This reflects a gender dimension of the campaign, the perceived role of what a political wife should be with resistance for women taking a prominent role, especially when they are not the one elected into office.

teo nie ching and jinggo gan babyAttacks on political candidates have extended to Nurul Izzah, Kamilia Ibrahim and Teo Nie Ching (left) from smut videos, calls of ‘traitor’ allegedly by no less than Rafidah Aziz herself now stationed in Kuala Kangsar to the recent disgraceful leaflets ridiculing Teo’s new motherhood role and breast feeding.

To make use of motherhood is not acceptable. The fact is that attacks on women backfire when they are perceived to be unfair, as shown in the past.

One only needs to look at the impact of attacks on Teresa Kok from 1999 onwards to see how foolhardy attacks on women can be politically.

Women stand as another group in this campaign that will set the direction for the country. They will shape who will lead their children, who will make the decisions that will shape their lives and who will be the leadership models for society.

From crime and security to the dignity of women, these issues will influence women in the polls. How national they are in voting will be decisive.

Despite the BN gender advantage, the underlying trends in political participation, campaign issues, fielding of women and attacks on women point to potential gains for Pakatan and for more women entering parliament. This will be a woman’s election, whatever the outcome.

 


DR BRIDGET WELSH is associate professor of political science at Singapore Management University. She is travelling around Malaysia to provide her GE13 analyses exclusively to Malaysiakini. Bridget can be reached at bwelsh@smu.edu.sg.

Short URL: http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=77939







Posted by
on Apr 27 2013. Filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Only what is in PR manifesto

Only what is in PR manifesto – hudud not included

KUALA LUMPUR: Pas deputy president Mohamad Sabu or better known as Mat Sabu says Pas will only implement what is stated in the Pakatan Rakyat’s manifesto.

 

Mat Sabu told The Mole on Thursday: “We will only implement what is on the manifesto. That’s our promise for this election.”

 

Hudud is not in the Pakatan manifesto.

 

When asked to comment on the recent statement made by Pas deputy spiritual leader Datuk Dr Haron Din recently that Pakatan will implement hudud (the syariah criminal code) if the opposition wins the election, Mat Sabu said: “You have to ask him yourself.”

 

“I do not want to say anything because you and other media will twist it. It’s the media game over this issue,” said the Pendang parliamentary seat candidate for Pas.

 

Mat Sabu’s remark is contradicting to Haron’s, who had reportedly said that hudud will be implemented if Pakatan wins the 13th General Election (GE) despite the objection from its partner, DAP.

 

He was quoted as saying: “I’m confident that DAP will accept hudud law because of its willingness to contest under the PAS symbol. However, this can only be done after Pakatan is given the mandate to rule the country.”

 

The Arau parliamentary seat candidate also said that Pakatan parties should give and take to work together.

 

The implementation of hudud is not mentioned in the opposition coalition’s manifesto which was unveiled on Feb 25 this year.

 

Another Pas leader, Khalid Samad agreed that Pas will follow what is accorded in the manifesto, but he also said that does not mean the party is not pursuing its hudud agenda.

 

Khalid said: “Obviously Pas is committed to its agenda but like I said before, we will only pursue it through democratic ways.”

 

“We need to get the people to debate and discuss on this matter in free and open society, which will only be achieved when Pakatan gets into power.”

 

Khalid said if it is proven that the public do not mind the implementation of hudud, “no right government in democracy will stand in its way.”

 

Meanwhile DAP chairman Karpal Singh reiterated that the party’s stand on hudud will not be changed even though it had initially agreed to use Pas’ logo to contest in the GE.

 

DAP initially contemplated using Pas and Parti Keadilan Rakyat’s (PKR) banners in the general election when the Registrar of Societies (ROS) did not recognise its central executive committee (CEC) line-up elected in the party elections last December.

 

A blogger known as Tunku Aisha had previously wrote that the exclusion of hudud in the manifesto shocked many Pas supporters.

 

“Perhaps in the final days before GE13, some Pas leaders might just try to sell the hudud issue to their supporters, then again, what is the use?

 

Fact is, Pas fail to influence PR to accept hudud. Hudud will forever remain as Pas’ dream and their party politics,” the post read.

 

Hindraf de facto leader P.Uthayakumar reportedly said that the Chinese voters in Bukit Raja are afraid that hudud will be implemented and that may cause Pakatan to lose the parliamentary seat.

Source: MOLE

Only what is in PR manifesto

Only what is in PR manifesto – hudud not included

KUALA LUMPUR: Pas deputy president Mohamad Sabu or better known as Mat Sabu says Pas will only implement what is stated in the Pakatan Rakyat’s manifesto.

 

Mat Sabu told The Mole on Thursday: “We will only implement what is on the manifesto. That’s our promise for this election.”

 

Hudud is not in the Pakatan manifesto.

 

When asked to comment on the recent statement made by Pas deputy spiritual leader Datuk Dr Haron Din recently that Pakatan will implement hudud (the syariah criminal code) if the opposition wins the election, Mat Sabu said: “You have to ask him yourself.”

 

“I do not want to say anything because you and other media will twist it. It’s the media game over this issue,” said the Pendang parliamentary seat candidate for Pas.

 

Mat Sabu’s remark is contradicting to Haron’s, who had reportedly said that hudud will be implemented if Pakatan wins the 13th General Election (GE) despite the objection from its partner, DAP.

 

He was quoted as saying: “I’m confident that DAP will accept hudud law because of its willingness to contest under the PAS symbol. However, this can only be done after Pakatan is given the mandate to rule the country.”

 

The Arau parliamentary seat candidate also said that Pakatan parties should give and take to work together.

 

The implementation of hudud is not mentioned in the opposition coalition’s manifesto which was unveiled on Feb 25 this year.

 

Another Pas leader, Khalid Samad agreed that Pas will follow what is accorded in the manifesto, but he also said that does not mean the party is not pursuing its hudud agenda.

 

Khalid said: “Obviously Pas is committed to its agenda but like I said before, we will only pursue it through democratic ways.”

 

“We need to get the people to debate and discuss on this matter in free and open society, which will only be achieved when Pakatan gets into power.”

 

Khalid said if it is proven that the public do not mind the implementation of hudud, “no right government in democracy will stand in its way.”

 

Meanwhile DAP chairman Karpal Singh reiterated that the party’s stand on hudud will not be changed even though it had initially agreed to use Pas’ logo to contest in the GE.

 

DAP initially contemplated using Pas and Parti Keadilan Rakyat’s (PKR) banners in the general election when the Registrar of Societies (ROS) did not recognise its central executive committee (CEC) line-up elected in the party elections last December.

 

A blogger known as Tunku Aisha had previously wrote that the exclusion of hudud in the manifesto shocked many Pas supporters.

 

“Perhaps in the final days before GE13, some Pas leaders might just try to sell the hudud issue to their supporters, then again, what is the use?

 

Fact is, Pas fail to influence PR to accept hudud. Hudud will forever remain as Pas’ dream and their party politics,” the post read.

 

Hindraf de facto leader P.Uthayakumar reportedly said that the Chinese voters in Bukit Raja are afraid that hudud will be implemented and that may cause Pakatan to lose the parliamentary seat.

Source: MOLE

PKR and PAS: The ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics

PKR and PAS: The ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics

Parti KeAdilan Rakyat (PKR) cannot be described as a true political party in Malaysia. It was formed for a different reason, which has got nothing to do with any political agenda of national interests, other than to be a sworn enemy of Umno. 

 

However, in the process, it became a party which is a sworn enemy of Barisan Nasional, i.e. by default. 


The main characters involved in the formation of PKR are those who were staunch supporters of Umno and Barisan. 

 

And the supporting characters are mostly the wives, children and also cronies of the de facto leader and founder of PKR, who is Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. 

 

So what can one say of this party? It does not aim to champion some wonderful national political cause, but aims to belittle and condemn the very party and coalition of parties which had trusted its founders and staunch supporters in the first place. 

 

So it is not wrong for anyone to say PKR is a party of Umno and Barisan misfits, rejects and ingrates. 


Now Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) is also in such a situation when it readily accepts a former senior Umno leader, Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib as its member, who left Umno and Barisan in such haste that one wonders if he decided to join PAS in order to further extend his political life in order that it does not take him into his ‘second political childhood’. 

 

Being in politics in Malaysia all his life, surely Muhammad Muhammad Taib cannot bear the brunt of not being able to hog the political scene for a while longer, even if he is now on the other side. 

 

Unfortunately, most of the original founders of PKR have left the party to join mainstream politics, and are now most vocal in their criticism of PKR and its lead founder, Anwar. 

 

One can almost discount Anwar’s first daughter, Nurul Izzah for any diatribe which she may have about Umno and Barisan as she is merely performing her filial duty and not a national duty. 

 

And her last win in the Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat was a fluke. The voters just wanted to get rid of Wanita Umno chief, incumbent Datuk Seri Sharizat Jalil, and not because they liked Nurul more. Just like how Loh Gwo Burne, who won in Kelana Jaya and became a one-term Member of Parliament after his party did not extend his political life by nominating him for the 13th general elections. 

 

Gwo Burne could not speak Malay at all and had given or read only one speech in his halting Malay while in Parliament through the last five years, which dealt with some foreign affairs matters, that made Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar, the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, smile widely. 

 

Anwar was very angry for not being able to succeed Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as Prime Minister. He thought Dr Mahathir had made a very bad and awful decision for sacking him as his deputy. 

 

But why did Anwar and his supporters think Dr Mahathir had made such a wise move by accepting Anwar into Umno and hence the Mahathir Cabinet, and who later shot up in the Umno and Barisan hierarchy quickly so much so that those who had been waiting in line had to be removed or sidelined? 

 

And yet, when Dr Mahathir had the wisdom to change his mind about Anwar and sack him, why then did Anwar and his supporters not say it was also a wise move by Mahathir? 

 

From being someone who was wise, by admitting Anwar and accepting all his quirks and style, suddenly Dr Mahathir had become not wise simply because he had chosen not to allow Anwar to have his way anymore. 

 

Being the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia is not a right; party members of Umno do not choose who becomes the Deputy Prime Minister. The right rests in the good hands of the Prime Minister himself and it is his prerogative to appoint and even sack anyone in the Cabinet as he so pleases. 

 

And there were many Umno and Barisan leaders who had to face similar music before as it is the practice of an incumbent Prime Minister to discontinue the services of any member of his Cabinet who he finds to have served too long or who deserves to be ‘promoted’ to retirement, a ‘post’ which many may find to be disconcerting as they think political life in Malaysia is enduring and all-encompassing so not many of them have made retirement plans. 

 

So when it finally happens, one gets a rude shock. 

 

One way to overcome this shock is to become a turncoat and join PKR and now PAS, the two parties which can be described as the ‘graveyards’ and ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics, especially by those who think that there is indeed life after political death, who may be party-spoilers.  

Source: MOLE

PKR and PAS: The ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics

PKR and PAS: The ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics

Parti KeAdilan Rakyat (PKR) cannot be described as a true political party in Malaysia. It was formed for a different reason, which has got nothing to do with any political agenda of national interests, other than to be a sworn enemy of Umno. 

 

However, in the process, it became a party which is a sworn enemy of Barisan Nasional, i.e. by default. 


The main characters involved in the formation of PKR are those who were staunch supporters of Umno and Barisan. 

 

And the supporting characters are mostly the wives, children and also cronies of the de facto leader and founder of PKR, who is Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. 

 

So what can one say of this party? It does not aim to champion some wonderful national political cause, but aims to belittle and condemn the very party and coalition of parties which had trusted its founders and staunch supporters in the first place. 

 

So it is not wrong for anyone to say PKR is a party of Umno and Barisan misfits, rejects and ingrates. 


Now Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) is also in such a situation when it readily accepts a former senior Umno leader, Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib as its member, who left Umno and Barisan in such haste that one wonders if he decided to join PAS in order to further extend his political life in order that it does not take him into his ‘second political childhood’. 

 

Being in politics in Malaysia all his life, surely Muhammad Muhammad Taib cannot bear the brunt of not being able to hog the political scene for a while longer, even if he is now on the other side. 

 

Unfortunately, most of the original founders of PKR have left the party to join mainstream politics, and are now most vocal in their criticism of PKR and its lead founder, Anwar. 

 

One can almost discount Anwar’s first daughter, Nurul Izzah for any diatribe which she may have about Umno and Barisan as she is merely performing her filial duty and not a national duty. 

 

And her last win in the Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat was a fluke. The voters just wanted to get rid of Wanita Umno chief, incumbent Datuk Seri Sharizat Jalil, and not because they liked Nurul more. Just like how Loh Gwo Burne, who won in Kelana Jaya and became a one-term Member of Parliament after his party did not extend his political life by nominating him for the 13th general elections. 

 

Gwo Burne could not speak Malay at all and had given or read only one speech in his halting Malay while in Parliament through the last five years, which dealt with some foreign affairs matters, that made Tan Sri Syed Hamid Albar, the then Minister of Foreign Affairs, smile widely. 

 

Anwar was very angry for not being able to succeed Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as Prime Minister. He thought Dr Mahathir had made a very bad and awful decision for sacking him as his deputy. 

 

But why did Anwar and his supporters think Dr Mahathir had made such a wise move by accepting Anwar into Umno and hence the Mahathir Cabinet, and who later shot up in the Umno and Barisan hierarchy quickly so much so that those who had been waiting in line had to be removed or sidelined? 

 

And yet, when Dr Mahathir had the wisdom to change his mind about Anwar and sack him, why then did Anwar and his supporters not say it was also a wise move by Mahathir? 

 

From being someone who was wise, by admitting Anwar and accepting all his quirks and style, suddenly Dr Mahathir had become not wise simply because he had chosen not to allow Anwar to have his way anymore. 

 

Being the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia is not a right; party members of Umno do not choose who becomes the Deputy Prime Minister. The right rests in the good hands of the Prime Minister himself and it is his prerogative to appoint and even sack anyone in the Cabinet as he so pleases. 

 

And there were many Umno and Barisan leaders who had to face similar music before as it is the practice of an incumbent Prime Minister to discontinue the services of any member of his Cabinet who he finds to have served too long or who deserves to be ‘promoted’ to retirement, a ‘post’ which many may find to be disconcerting as they think political life in Malaysia is enduring and all-encompassing so not many of them have made retirement plans. 

 

So when it finally happens, one gets a rude shock. 

 

One way to overcome this shock is to become a turncoat and join PKR and now PAS, the two parties which can be described as the ‘graveyards’ and ‘dumping grounds’ of Malaysian politics, especially by those who think that there is indeed life after political death, who may be party-spoilers.  

Source: MOLE

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

In an email to the Editor, Calvin Sankaran wrote:

 

One of the most stunning examples of the power of propaganda can be seen in a documentary by the National Geographic called “Explorer: Inside North Korea”. This documentary chronicles the adventures of a Nepalese eye doctor who performs cataract surgeries on North Koreans who had been blind since birth due to the abject poverty wrought by the policies of their totalitarian government.

 

When their bandages were finally removed and the Koreans were able to see for the first time, instead of thanking the doctor and his team who performed the surgeries, the Koreans fell to their knees and profusely thanked their Dear Leader and the North Korean President Kim Jong Il. This incident is a powerful and eye-opening demonstration that while modern medicine can cure blindness of the eyes, nothing can remove blindness of mind caused by the extensive and skilful application of political propaganda.

 

It is a mistake to think that such all-pervasive propaganda only exists in dictatorships. Noam Chomsky astutely observed that “Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state”. In Malaysia, too, the rakyat are being bombarded on a 24/7 basis with a highly-focused and intense propaganda blitz — not by Biro Tata Negara (BTN) or the Main Stream Media (MSM) as most people seem to think, but by the PR-savvy Opposition using social media and the alternative online news portals.

 

One of the most elaborate and beautiful lies that Pakatan has carefully and painstakingly constructed over the last five years is the myth that the DAP-led state government has turned Penang into a Utopian Super State where good governance reigns while poverty and corruption have been totally eradicated. Lim Guan Eng, the Chief Minister, is relentlessly heralded and branded as a Superman and a Global Statesman in the mould of Lee Kuan Yew, Mahatma Gandhi and Abraham Lincoln.

 

In truth, Penang’s much-lauded “success” is a mere mirage and the CM’s superhuman leadership abilities are as real as the Loch Ness monster, as the analysis below will clearly show. Like the Russian Minister Grigory Potemkin who constructed a fake settlement to deceive the Empress Catherine II, Penang’s image as a Super State is a fake wonderland constructed by the DAP leadership, ably supported by their horde of Cybertroopers.

 

1. Eradication of poverty

 

The greatest liars and the most successful salesmen know that the most convincing way of lying is by mixing lies with half-truths. One of the DAP’s proudest boasts is the claim that they have magically eliminated poverty in Penang. What they cleverly and cunningly conceal from their audience is that back in 2008 (when they assumed power) the incidence of hard-core poverty was a mere 0.1% and that Penang was already the second-richest state in the country.

 

Reducing the hard-core poverty from 0.1% to 0% by 2012 is hardly an achievement that is worth crowing about, especially since there were three other states that achieved “zero hard-core poverty” well before Penang.

 

2. Open tender

 

Guan Eng never fails to boast about his Open Tender policy in every ceramah, debate, forum, interview or newspaper column when he speaks about the DAP’s management superiority over BN. He credits this policy with eliminating corruption and cronyism in Penang and saving millions in public funds. Unfortunately there is a massive gap between this fiction and the reality on the ground.

 

Penang’s Open Tender policy has been so discredited, decimated and mired in endless controversies that it is seen as the DAP’s greatest liability by Penangites. The only thing open about the Open Tender system is that it is being openly abused by Lim and his minions to award multi-billion ringgit projects to their favoured developers and contractors.  

 

No one is quite sure how the system works but it has produced numerous controversial and highly-suspicious contract awards. For example, the Bayan Mutiara deal, the eSpice exhibition centre contract, and lately the Tunnel-Highway mega project have all created so much confusion, anger, opposition, bitterness and controversy in the state despite the CM claiming to have awarded the contracts via the Open Tender system. Despite being pressured by the rakyat, political parties and NGOs, the CM steadfastly and mule-headedly refuses to reveal the details on how these contracts were awarded. These contracts clearly enriched the private companies who stand to rake in billions in profits at the expense of the rakyat and the long-term benefit of the state.

 

3. Debt reduction

 

Another of Guan Eng’s Jesus-like miraculous claims is that he reduced the state’s debt by 95% from RM630 million on 8 March 2008 to RM30 million at the end of 2011. However his claim was soon to be exposed as a sham. It was revealed that the debt was reduced not due to any efforts by Guan Eng or his administration but due to a payment of RM655 million by the federal government to the state as compensation for taking over Penang’s water assets. Despite being exposed, Guan Eng continued to conceal the truth and kept up his claims on the ceramah circuit, which were lapped up by the adoring and swooning Pakatan supporters.

 

4. Anti-Corruption

 

Penang is presented as a shining example of a state free of corruption and ruled by a state administration which has “zero tolerance” for bribery and cronyism. Guan Eng markets himself as a tireless anti-corruption crusader. However, as with other claims, the reality is vastly different. What DAP leaders conveniently neglect to mention in their ceramahs is that the state’s first Deputy Chief Minister 1 (DCM1), Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin, was forced to resign in 2009 when the MACC started investigating him for corruption.

 

More recently an aide of the current DCM1 was arrested and charged for offering a bribe to a complainant to cover up a sexual harassment case. Another shocker was the arrest of Roslan Yahya, the District Offer for Seberang Prai Tengah and one of the most senior officers in the state, by the MACC.   

 

5. Asset Declaration

 

Much has been made of the public asset declarations by Guan Eng and his exco. However, this move again was heavily criticised and mocked for a lack of sincerity. Firstly, the state government took almost four years to make the asset declaration. If Lim Guan Eng and his administration are really sincere they would have done this within weeks of assuming the state’s reins back in 2008.

 

Secondly, the rushed and abrupt manner in which the declaration was made seems to indicate that it was made for political expediency and with an eye on the coming 13th General Election.

 

Thirdly, the declaration did not include the councillors’ spouses and family members. It is well known that corrupted politicians escape detection by transferring their assets to their spouses and family members.

 

Finally, it was claimed that the declaration was verified by a leading audit company. However the online version of the asset declaration did not carry any indication of this verification

 

6. Financial Management

 

Another oft-quoted and much-hyped “achievement” of Penang under Guan Eng is the state’s supposedly superior financial skills and prudence. Guan Eng even claimed that the Auditor-General (AG) had commended Penang as the best-managed state in the country. The only problem with the statement is that the AG never made the commendation, nor has Penang been shown to be the best-managed state in the nation.

 

In fact, the DAP government conveniently omits some very worrying points highlighted and uncovered in the 2011 AG’s Report. The most stunning revelation was that the state government’s spending has ballooned by a shocking 84 percent over the last five years! Such reckless wastage and uncontrolled spending of public funds is certainly not a mark of a prudent and responsible government at all. At this rate, the state’s spending will overtake its income. At the current rate of spending increase it is estimated that in another four years the state will go bankrupt!

 

Another major expose in the AG Report was the sources of income for the state. LGE has been in chest-beating mode about how Penang has increased its income by leaps and bounds. However the AG’s Report lays bare this claim by revealing that most of the state’s income is derived from land-related sales and tax-related matters. This means by selling off state land, increasing development costs and other land-related fees, the state has managed to hike up its revenues rather than as “the dividends of anti-corruption measures”.

 

Another of Guan Eng’s so-called achievements was the surplus budget of the state for the last three years. Of all the CM’s boasts, this is the only valid claim – on the surface. However, a budget surplus does not by itself equate with financial skills but very often indicates accounting chicanery. The trick that Guan Eng employs to fool people is easy to spot since it has been often utilised in financial shenanigans in the business world to defraud investors. What he does every year is to table a huge deficit budget – for example for the year 2013 he is planning for a deficit budget of RM213million. And then he spends less than the monstrously inflated budget and then claims to hit a surplus at the year’s end and voila! He’s a genius!

 

7. Investment ranking

 

Guan Eng has been quick to congratulate himself for the fact that Penang was ranked number one in Malaysia for the year 2009 and 2010 in attracting investment. While there is no disputing this fact, the real question is about who is actually responsible for this feat. It is a known fact in the industry that the state’s investment procurement was entirely due to the efforts of the federal government and MIDA as well as Guan Eng’s predecessor Koh Tsu Khoon. It is also a known fact that Lim’s administration has failed to attract even a single major investor to the state during the last five years. As such it was no surprise that Penang fell to number six in the investment ranking in 2012 and will likely plunge further this year. The drop in the amount of investment received was a shocking 73 percent!

 

8. Good Governance

 

One of the key themes of the Pakatan coalition and the DAP is democratic rights. Winning Penang gave the DAP a perfect opportunity and platform to introduce democratic practices and policies in administrating the state. Instead of looking at the best practices of the more advanced democracies, Guan Eng has elected to Look East and has copied the North Korean model of dynastic dictatorship. The CM runs the state like a despot with him as Penang’s Dear Leader controlling every aspect of the government. The Deputy CMs and the rest of the Exco are mere puppets and rubber stamps to the CM. He has cultivated a cult of personality and bulldozes his decisions through the rubber-stamp State Assembly and Exco. Anyone who dares to question Lim is hounded and mercilessly attacked by the DAP’s highly-organised “Brown-Shirts” – the thuggish supporters and cyber-troopers.

 

9. Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT)

 

Guan Eng’s mantra of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT) has been his trademark since he first assumed the post of CM. While he has been ceaselessly promoting this CAT slogan, it has remained a mere marketing gimmick and political rhetoric rather than ever being put into practice. We have seen the numerous blunders of LGE’s government that completely negated his claim of “competency”. Guan Eng’s penchant for quickly claiming credit for the achievements of others while blaming his predecessor, BN/UMNO and the Federal government is a well-known fact. 

 

There has never been a case where Guan Eng has admitted to his mistakes and apologised. In transparency, too, he has failed to live up to his hype. Despite his promise of making government records public, he has so far only released partial minutes of meetings, and even that is only the records of the previous government. He has refused on many occasions to release minutes of his exco meetings, contents of contentious contracts or other details. As such, CAT remains as a mere political marketing slogan with a bite.

 

10. Local council elections

 

Despite promising to restore the local government elections in their manifesto for the 2008 General Election, the DAP administration failed to carry out its pledge by employing its typical modus operandi – dishing out excuses and playing the blame game. First it formed a Working Group (WG) to study the feasibility of holding the polls. Why the state government would need to conduct the study is a puzzle since the DAP had been claiming for years that the law allows local council elections and even included it in the election manifesto. Unsurprisingly the WG concluded that the law doesn’t allow for such elections and ridiculously recommended that the state government should pass the motion in the state assembly urging the federal government to enact laws to allow it.

 

In another equally asinine and laughable move, Guan Eng wrote to the EC requesting it conduct the elections. The EC replied, unsurprisingly, that it couldn’t do so legally so under the existing law but told Penang to go ahead and hold the polls themselves. However, in order to confuse people and avoid holding the election, Guan Eng kept giving excuse after excuse. When he ran out of excuses he went ahead and passed a law at the state assembly on local government elections, knowing full well that this was against not just the law but also common sense.

 

A few weeks ago, when it was clear that the GE was around the corner, he dramatically filed a petition in the Federal Court to allow the state the right to hold local council elections. That Guan Eng has no intention of ever restoring the Third Vote is crystal clear. If he were really serious in his intentions he could have done it long ago. It is a shocking fact that there are more political appointees in MPPP and MPSP (the local councils of Penang) now under Guan Eng’s administration than during his predecessor’s reign. In fact Guan Eng treats MPPP and MPSP as his personal fiefdom and an extension of his administration, which can be seen from numerous episodes. As such, independently-elected local councils would not serve his interests and political games.

 

I am sure that many Penangites will agree with the following personality analysis that seems to describe the leadership style of the Penang Chief Minister very succinctly and accurately: “His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”

Source: MOLE

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

Penang : Pakatan’s Potemkin Paradise

In an email to the Editor, Calvin Sankaran wrote:

 

One of the most stunning examples of the power of propaganda can be seen in a documentary by the National Geographic called “Explorer: Inside North Korea”. This documentary chronicles the adventures of a Nepalese eye doctor who performs cataract surgeries on North Koreans who had been blind since birth due to the abject poverty wrought by the policies of their totalitarian government.

 

When their bandages were finally removed and the Koreans were able to see for the first time, instead of thanking the doctor and his team who performed the surgeries, the Koreans fell to their knees and profusely thanked their Dear Leader and the North Korean President Kim Jong Il. This incident is a powerful and eye-opening demonstration that while modern medicine can cure blindness of the eyes, nothing can remove blindness of mind caused by the extensive and skilful application of political propaganda.

 

It is a mistake to think that such all-pervasive propaganda only exists in dictatorships. Noam Chomsky astutely observed that “Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state”. In Malaysia, too, the rakyat are being bombarded on a 24/7 basis with a highly-focused and intense propaganda blitz — not by Biro Tata Negara (BTN) or the Main Stream Media (MSM) as most people seem to think, but by the PR-savvy Opposition using social media and the alternative online news portals.

 

One of the most elaborate and beautiful lies that Pakatan has carefully and painstakingly constructed over the last five years is the myth that the DAP-led state government has turned Penang into a Utopian Super State where good governance reigns while poverty and corruption have been totally eradicated. Lim Guan Eng, the Chief Minister, is relentlessly heralded and branded as a Superman and a Global Statesman in the mould of Lee Kuan Yew, Mahatma Gandhi and Abraham Lincoln.

 

In truth, Penang’s much-lauded “success” is a mere mirage and the CM’s superhuman leadership abilities are as real as the Loch Ness monster, as the analysis below will clearly show. Like the Russian Minister Grigory Potemkin who constructed a fake settlement to deceive the Empress Catherine II, Penang’s image as a Super State is a fake wonderland constructed by the DAP leadership, ably supported by their horde of Cybertroopers.

 

1. Eradication of poverty

 

The greatest liars and the most successful salesmen know that the most convincing way of lying is by mixing lies with half-truths. One of the DAP’s proudest boasts is the claim that they have magically eliminated poverty in Penang. What they cleverly and cunningly conceal from their audience is that back in 2008 (when they assumed power) the incidence of hard-core poverty was a mere 0.1% and that Penang was already the second-richest state in the country.

 

Reducing the hard-core poverty from 0.1% to 0% by 2012 is hardly an achievement that is worth crowing about, especially since there were three other states that achieved “zero hard-core poverty” well before Penang.

 

2. Open tender

 

Guan Eng never fails to boast about his Open Tender policy in every ceramah, debate, forum, interview or newspaper column when he speaks about the DAP’s management superiority over BN. He credits this policy with eliminating corruption and cronyism in Penang and saving millions in public funds. Unfortunately there is a massive gap between this fiction and the reality on the ground.

 

Penang’s Open Tender policy has been so discredited, decimated and mired in endless controversies that it is seen as the DAP’s greatest liability by Penangites. The only thing open about the Open Tender system is that it is being openly abused by Lim and his minions to award multi-billion ringgit projects to their favoured developers and contractors.  

 

No one is quite sure how the system works but it has produced numerous controversial and highly-suspicious contract awards. For example, the Bayan Mutiara deal, the eSpice exhibition centre contract, and lately the Tunnel-Highway mega project have all created so much confusion, anger, opposition, bitterness and controversy in the state despite the CM claiming to have awarded the contracts via the Open Tender system. Despite being pressured by the rakyat, political parties and NGOs, the CM steadfastly and mule-headedly refuses to reveal the details on how these contracts were awarded. These contracts clearly enriched the private companies who stand to rake in billions in profits at the expense of the rakyat and the long-term benefit of the state.

 

3. Debt reduction

 

Another of Guan Eng’s Jesus-like miraculous claims is that he reduced the state’s debt by 95% from RM630 million on 8 March 2008 to RM30 million at the end of 2011. However his claim was soon to be exposed as a sham. It was revealed that the debt was reduced not due to any efforts by Guan Eng or his administration but due to a payment of RM655 million by the federal government to the state as compensation for taking over Penang’s water assets. Despite being exposed, Guan Eng continued to conceal the truth and kept up his claims on the ceramah circuit, which were lapped up by the adoring and swooning Pakatan supporters.

 

4. Anti-Corruption

 

Penang is presented as a shining example of a state free of corruption and ruled by a state administration which has “zero tolerance” for bribery and cronyism. Guan Eng markets himself as a tireless anti-corruption crusader. However, as with other claims, the reality is vastly different. What DAP leaders conveniently neglect to mention in their ceramahs is that the state’s first Deputy Chief Minister 1 (DCM1), Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin, was forced to resign in 2009 when the MACC started investigating him for corruption.

 

More recently an aide of the current DCM1 was arrested and charged for offering a bribe to a complainant to cover up a sexual harassment case. Another shocker was the arrest of Roslan Yahya, the District Offer for Seberang Prai Tengah and one of the most senior officers in the state, by the MACC.   

 

5. Asset Declaration

 

Much has been made of the public asset declarations by Guan Eng and his exco. However, this move again was heavily criticised and mocked for a lack of sincerity. Firstly, the state government took almost four years to make the asset declaration. If Lim Guan Eng and his administration are really sincere they would have done this within weeks of assuming the state’s reins back in 2008.

 

Secondly, the rushed and abrupt manner in which the declaration was made seems to indicate that it was made for political expediency and with an eye on the coming 13th General Election.

 

Thirdly, the declaration did not include the councillors’ spouses and family members. It is well known that corrupted politicians escape detection by transferring their assets to their spouses and family members.

 

Finally, it was claimed that the declaration was verified by a leading audit company. However the online version of the asset declaration did not carry any indication of this verification

 

6. Financial Management

 

Another oft-quoted and much-hyped “achievement” of Penang under Guan Eng is the state’s supposedly superior financial skills and prudence. Guan Eng even claimed that the Auditor-General (AG) had commended Penang as the best-managed state in the country. The only problem with the statement is that the AG never made the commendation, nor has Penang been shown to be the best-managed state in the nation.

 

In fact, the DAP government conveniently omits some very worrying points highlighted and uncovered in the 2011 AG’s Report. The most stunning revelation was that the state government’s spending has ballooned by a shocking 84 percent over the last five years! Such reckless wastage and uncontrolled spending of public funds is certainly not a mark of a prudent and responsible government at all. At this rate, the state’s spending will overtake its income. At the current rate of spending increase it is estimated that in another four years the state will go bankrupt!

 

Another major expose in the AG Report was the sources of income for the state. LGE has been in chest-beating mode about how Penang has increased its income by leaps and bounds. However the AG’s Report lays bare this claim by revealing that most of the state’s income is derived from land-related sales and tax-related matters. This means by selling off state land, increasing development costs and other land-related fees, the state has managed to hike up its revenues rather than as “the dividends of anti-corruption measures”.

 

Another of Guan Eng’s so-called achievements was the surplus budget of the state for the last three years. Of all the CM’s boasts, this is the only valid claim – on the surface. However, a budget surplus does not by itself equate with financial skills but very often indicates accounting chicanery. The trick that Guan Eng employs to fool people is easy to spot since it has been often utilised in financial shenanigans in the business world to defraud investors. What he does every year is to table a huge deficit budget – for example for the year 2013 he is planning for a deficit budget of RM213million. And then he spends less than the monstrously inflated budget and then claims to hit a surplus at the year’s end and voila! He’s a genius!

 

7. Investment ranking

 

Guan Eng has been quick to congratulate himself for the fact that Penang was ranked number one in Malaysia for the year 2009 and 2010 in attracting investment. While there is no disputing this fact, the real question is about who is actually responsible for this feat. It is a known fact in the industry that the state’s investment procurement was entirely due to the efforts of the federal government and MIDA as well as Guan Eng’s predecessor Koh Tsu Khoon. It is also a known fact that Lim’s administration has failed to attract even a single major investor to the state during the last five years. As such it was no surprise that Penang fell to number six in the investment ranking in 2012 and will likely plunge further this year. The drop in the amount of investment received was a shocking 73 percent!

 

8. Good Governance

 

One of the key themes of the Pakatan coalition and the DAP is democratic rights. Winning Penang gave the DAP a perfect opportunity and platform to introduce democratic practices and policies in administrating the state. Instead of looking at the best practices of the more advanced democracies, Guan Eng has elected to Look East and has copied the North Korean model of dynastic dictatorship. The CM runs the state like a despot with him as Penang’s Dear Leader controlling every aspect of the government. The Deputy CMs and the rest of the Exco are mere puppets and rubber stamps to the CM. He has cultivated a cult of personality and bulldozes his decisions through the rubber-stamp State Assembly and Exco. Anyone who dares to question Lim is hounded and mercilessly attacked by the DAP’s highly-organised “Brown-Shirts” – the thuggish supporters and cyber-troopers.

 

9. Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT)

 

Guan Eng’s mantra of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT) has been his trademark since he first assumed the post of CM. While he has been ceaselessly promoting this CAT slogan, it has remained a mere marketing gimmick and political rhetoric rather than ever being put into practice. We have seen the numerous blunders of LGE’s government that completely negated his claim of “competency”. Guan Eng’s penchant for quickly claiming credit for the achievements of others while blaming his predecessor, BN/UMNO and the Federal government is a well-known fact. 

 

There has never been a case where Guan Eng has admitted to his mistakes and apologised. In transparency, too, he has failed to live up to his hype. Despite his promise of making government records public, he has so far only released partial minutes of meetings, and even that is only the records of the previous government. He has refused on many occasions to release minutes of his exco meetings, contents of contentious contracts or other details. As such, CAT remains as a mere political marketing slogan with a bite.

 

10. Local council elections

 

Despite promising to restore the local government elections in their manifesto for the 2008 General Election, the DAP administration failed to carry out its pledge by employing its typical modus operandi – dishing out excuses and playing the blame game. First it formed a Working Group (WG) to study the feasibility of holding the polls. Why the state government would need to conduct the study is a puzzle since the DAP had been claiming for years that the law allows local council elections and even included it in the election manifesto. Unsurprisingly the WG concluded that the law doesn’t allow for such elections and ridiculously recommended that the state government should pass the motion in the state assembly urging the federal government to enact laws to allow it.

 

In another equally asinine and laughable move, Guan Eng wrote to the EC requesting it conduct the elections. The EC replied, unsurprisingly, that it couldn’t do so legally so under the existing law but told Penang to go ahead and hold the polls themselves. However, in order to confuse people and avoid holding the election, Guan Eng kept giving excuse after excuse. When he ran out of excuses he went ahead and passed a law at the state assembly on local government elections, knowing full well that this was against not just the law but also common sense.

 

A few weeks ago, when it was clear that the GE was around the corner, he dramatically filed a petition in the Federal Court to allow the state the right to hold local council elections. That Guan Eng has no intention of ever restoring the Third Vote is crystal clear. If he were really serious in his intentions he could have done it long ago. It is a shocking fact that there are more political appointees in MPPP and MPSP (the local councils of Penang) now under Guan Eng’s administration than during his predecessor’s reign. In fact Guan Eng treats MPPP and MPSP as his personal fiefdom and an extension of his administration, which can be seen from numerous episodes. As such, independently-elected local councils would not serve his interests and political games.

 

I am sure that many Penangites will agree with the following personality analysis that seems to describe the leadership style of the Penang Chief Minister very succinctly and accurately: “His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”

Source: MOLE

Karpal wants Anwar to state stand on hudud, Islamic state

Karpal wants Anwar to state stand on hudud, Islamic state

GEORGE TOWN: DAP chairman Karpal Singh is insisting that PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim state his stand on hudud law (Islamic penal code) and the Islamic state pursued by PAS, their ally in the three-party opposition pact.

 

Karpal said that as the prime minister nominee of the pact, it was incumbent upon Anwar to clearly voice his stand on the two issues.

 

He said that the plan by PAS leaders to implement hudud and turn Malaysia into an Islamic state had affected the mutual understanding among the allies and admitted that the issues would give an advantage to Barisan Nasional (BN) in the May 5 general elections.

 

“I think Anwar should clearly state his stand. I think the people are expecting it. (DAP adviser) Lim Kit Siang and secretary-general Lim Guan Eng have stated the party’s stand. They’re not for hudud, they are not for an Islamic state,” Karpal said to reporters here Friday.

 

Karpal said he was stating his party’s official position.

 

PAS deputy spiritual adviser Datuk Dr Haron Din had said recently that the party was firm in its plan to implement hudud law if the opposition pact formed the next government.

 

However Karpal opposed, saying that the DAP was against the formation of an Islamic state which will enforce hudud law.

Source: MOLE

Kyplex Cloud Security Seal - Click for Verification